Pentagon weighs supply options amid spat

washington — Pentagon officials are watching for Pakistan’s next moves after Washington froze security aid payments to Islamabad, saying it is not doing enough to target Afghan Taleban and Haqqani group bases.

The Trump administration’s decision to withhold hundreds of millions from its “coalition support funds” has riled Pakistan, with some there calling for retaliatory measures that might hamper America’s warfighting efforts in neighboring Afghanistan.

Most problematic for America as it wages its 16-year war in Afghanistan would be if Pakistan shut its border points into the country, stemming the vital flow of goods, food and gear from the port at Karachi.

Though US officials insisted they’d seen no evidence Islamabad was planning such a move, it

Pakistan could within its rights... say you will not use our air space. That would be a humungous problem Christine Fair, A South Asia expert

has happened before. In 2011, Pakistan closed its border to Nato supplies following a series of incidents that brought relations between the US and Pakistan to alltime lows.

At the time, the US-led forces in Afghanistan endured the closure by relying on cargo flights and a more costly northern route through Russia, Central Asia and the Caucasus.

Citing security reasons, the Pentagon declined to provide percentages of US supplies going into Afghanistan through Pakistan, but Afghan security forces in particular rely on the supply lines through Pakistan.

While the US favours Pakistan supply routes because of cost, officials stressed America has built “flexibility and redundancy” into its supply chains.

“As military planners, we develop multiple supply chain contingencies to sustain theatre requirements to maintain the train, advise and assist mission to the Afghan National Defence Security Forces,” Lieutenant Colonel Kone Faulkner said.

In Pakistan, several figures were quick to call on their government to close supply lines, including opposition leader Imran Khan.

But US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis told Pentagon reporters he had gotten no indication the Pakistanis were going to shut off ground supply lines, or air overflights.

“I am not concerned about them,” he said, referring to the supply lines. Mattis said the US continues to work with Pakistan and would restore security payments “if we see decisive movements against the terrorists who are as much of a threat against Pakistan as they are against us”.

For Christine Fair, a South Asia expert at Georgetown University, this part of the problem is key.

The Trump administration must clearly lay out what it expects from Pakistan and what additional punitive steps would be taken if it shuts down the supply lines, she said.

She was particularly concerned about the possibility of Pakistan closing its air space to America, meaning efforts to fly air cargo into Afghanistan could get much more difficult.

Pakistan “could within its rights... say you will not use our air space”, she said. “That would be a humungous problem.” — AFP