Judge refuses to hear PIL on allocation of cases

NEW DELHI — Justice J. Chelameswar, the second senior-most judge of the Supreme Court, on Thursday refused to hear a case filed by former Law Minister Shanti Bhushan questioning the authority of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) as master of the roster, saying “why should I, let this country decide its own course”.

Soon after, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for his petitioner father, mentioned the plea before a bench headed Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and it agreed to look into the issue.

Bhushan, mentioning the plea before Justice Chelameswar, requested the bench to take up the case seeking allocation of work to be done by a Collegium and argued that he had filed the plea last week but apex court registry was yet to list it.

Justice Chelameswar, refusing to interfere, said: “I would not like to deal with this matter... let this country decide its own course.”

Justice Chelameswar said “someone is running a relentless tirade against me that I am up to grab something”, adding that two months before (retirement), he doesn’t want to hear that he was

I don’t want another reversal of my order in 24 hours (referring to the earlier issue where he ordered setting up of bench that was reversed by the CJI’s bench) Justice Chelameswar

waiting to grab some office.

“I don’t want another reversal of my order in 24 hours (referring to the earlier issue where he ordered setting up of bench that was reversed by the CJI’s bench),” Justice Chelameswar added.

When Bhushan told the bench that the petition was filed last week and despite several follow ups, it has not been numbered yet, Justice Chelameswar said “(for) reasons too obvious in the history of the country I would not deal with this matter”.

During the mentioning of the case, Bhushan further said that he has written a letter to the court’s Secretary General asking that the PIL be placed before three seniormost judges after the CJI to obtain their instruction on its listing but nothing has been done.

“It’s an extraordinary circumstance; I am mentioning an extraordinary petition regarding the master of the roster. This petition should be listed...,” Bhushan maintained. After repeated requests from Bhushan to hear the plea, Justice Chelameswar said: “Let it take its own course of action. It’s not my problem anymore. Sorry, I am not taking it up.”