VAR is here to stay whether you like it or not
st petersburg — When it finally happened, many may not have realised they had just witnessed a moment of World Cup history.
Brazil were pushing Costa Rica hard in their second group game in St Petersburg, and with 12 minutes left and the sides scoreless, Neymar collapsed under a touch from Giancarlo Gonzalez, leading referee Bjorn Kuipers to award a penalty.
As the Brazilians celebrated, Kuipers held his hand up to his ear, nodded his head and slipped away to the sidelines.
He quickly returned, signalled he had watched the replays and reversed his decision, forcing Brazil to find another way to register their first win in Russia.
A video assistant referee (VAR) review had just overturned a penalty decision at the World Cup for the first time.
Contrary to fears that VAR would kill the debates that are often one of the game’s most enjoyable aspects, the system has if anything enhanced those
post-match post-mortems. It has also raised the standards of refereeing.
The willingness of officials to let play flow freely has been a key component of the excitement served up in Russia, where three or more goals have been scored in 26 of the 56 matches so far while only four players have been sent off.
And the tournament has had only one scoreless match — a stultifying draw between France and Denmark.
Compare that with the 2014 World Cup in Brazil, where fans and viewers sat through five scoreless group games and two more in the knockout rounds.
Criticism of referees and of VAR has been harsh, but the overall impact of both has been positive.
A record number of penalties have been awarded for foul play, while the sort of horror tackles that have scarred the consciousness of whole nations in the past has been largely conspicuous by its absence. —