Non-profit media could be the answer to fake news
The man best known for founding the digital classified listing service Craigslist recently gave a New York City journalism school $20 million. His gift was big enough to prompt rebranding at what will now be called the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at the City University of New York. Newmark’s big gift made a big splash, but charitable gifts that support the media are pretty common. Some 6,568 foundations gave non-profit media outlets a total of $1.8 billion distributed between 2010 and 2015, according to a recent study.
All that largesse is responding to the loss of hundreds of newspapers and 35,000 newsroom employees since 2006, according to Pew Research Center analysis of federal Bureau of Labor Statistics data. I believe this workforce erosion endangers all Americans because accurate and timely information is the lifeblood of any democracy. As Thomas Jefferson said, “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilisation, it expects what never was and never will be.”
Back when I founded the Center for Public Integrity, one of the country’s oldest and largest nonpartisan, non-profit investigative news organisations, at my home in 1989, it was just the third of its kind in the whole country. Two decades later, when I co-founded what later morphed into the Institute for Non-profit News, there were at least 27 of these operations.
According to Sue Cross, the institute’s executive director and CEO, there are approximately 270 US non-profit news sites today, 165 of which are annual dues-paying members of her organisation. Some are small with a handful of staffers. A few are much bigger.
After the cable TV entrepreneur-turned-philanthropist H.F. “Gerry” Lenfest bought Philadelphia’s two largest newspapers — The Philadelphia Inquirer, the Philadelphia Daily News and their joint website, philly.com — in 2016, he donated them to the Philadelphia Foundation. The non-profit Lenfest Institute for Journalism, to which he has donated $129.5 million, oversees the papers.
I expect non-profit daily news sites of that kind to become more common due to the collapse of commercial newspaper and television newsroom staff levels, which have weakened news coverage capacities.
Public media operations like National Public Radio, Public Broadcasting Service and individual broadcast stations get nearly half of the media funding foundations parcel out: $800 million, or 44.3 per cent of that $1.8 billion distributed between 2010 and 2015, according to a study from the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School and Northeastern University’s School of Journalism.
National non-profit media organisations such as ProPublica and the Center for Investigative Reporting took in $220 million. Local non-profit news outfits pulled in $80 million, and university-based journalism initiatives drew $36 million in grants over this same period.
In general, national non-profit media outlets attract more funding than local news operations. This lack of support for local news is coinciding with an increase in the number of “news deserts,” regions without viable commercial or non-profit news organisations.
This serious problem isn’t a surprise, given the disparities in terms of everything from the quality of trained medical personnel and facilities, to online internet access and per capita income between America’s rural and urban communities.
Why are foundations, individual philanthropists and now states pouring more money into the media? The answer is very simple. Without credible news and information, and thus a public that’s at least somewhat informed about the uses and abuses of power, a healthy democracy is not possible.
Why are foundations, individual philanthropists and now states pouring more money into the media? The answer is very simple. Without credible news and information, and thus a public that’s at least somewhat informed about the uses and abuses of power, a healthy democracy is not possible.
Maybe because his website took a big bite out of newspapers’ classified advertising revenue by digitally connecting buyers and sellers, which makes him at least indirectly responsible for some of the media’s decline, Newmark is clearly worried about that problem.
“In this time, when trustworthy news is under attack, somebody has to stand up,” he told The New York Times. “And the way you stand up these days is by putting your money where your mouth is.”
Cross, a former Associated Press executive, says donations to her organisation’s member organisations began to surge at the end of 2016.
“Initially we thought that might be prompted by reaction to (United States President Donald) Trump’s attacks on the press,” she told me. “We now believe it is a broader and more sustained growth in non-profit news fuelled in good part by community concern over continuing losses of reporting by the traditional press.” —The Conversation
Charles Lewis is Professor, School of Communication; Executive Editor, Investigative Reporting Workshop, American University School of Communication