Khaleej Times

With Sessions out, Mueller could be the next target

- Game of Thrones, TimoThy L o’BriEn —Bloomberg Timothy L O’Brien is the executive editor of Bloomberg Opinion. He has been an editor and writer for the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, HuffPost and Talk magazine

By forcing Attorney General Jeff Sessions out of the White House, President Donald Trump has made the Justice Department more beholden to him and left Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his probe of possible collusion between Trump’s 2016 presidenti­al campaign and Russia more firmly in Trump’s crosshairs.

News of Sessions’s defenestra­tion, as these things do in Washington’s low-rent version of

arrived via the president’s Twitter feed:

Sessions’s departure was a long time coming. Trump has openly disparaged Sessions ever since the former attorney general decided to recuse himself last year from direct oversight of the Russia probe and allowed Mueller — a veteran federal prosecutor known for his independen­ce and integrity — to be inserted atop the investigat­ion by his deputy, Rod Rosenstein.

Again, we refer you to Twitter:

Trump has decided to replace Sessions with Matthew Whitaker, who was named acting attorney general. Whitaker prepared for his new role as one of the nation’s most senior law enforcemen­t officials, in part, by serving as Sessions’s chief of staff. In the service of accountabi­lity and civic trust, Whitaker noted that he thought Mueller’s probe — then only about three months old — was “going too far.” Whitaker said he believed, based on his own experience as a prosecutor, that Mueller “has come up to a red line in the Russia 2016 election-meddling investigat­ion that he is dangerousl­y close to crossing.” He argued that Mueller had journeyed beyond the original mandate of the investigat­ion, which he interprete­d to be narrowly about collusion. Sessions appointed Whitaker as his chief of staff about six weeks later.

So no, Whitaker is unlikely to line up as a supporter of Mueller’s ongoing probe. But Mueller had been in danger long before this. Trump considered firing him during the summer of 2017, as the New York Times reported earlier this year, and I have argued in the past that I thought if Trump had to choose between his own (or his children’s) survival and executing Mueller, he would certainly opt for survival.

Trump has the power to fire Rosenstein if Rosenstein doesn’t obey the president’s request to lance Mueller. That would allow the dominoes to begin falling: Trump (perhaps in conjunctio­n with Whitaker or simply acting through him) could then get rid of Mueller and any other Mueller loyalist within the senior ranks of the Justice Department.

Although there’s disagreeme­nt among legal scholars about how forcefully the president can proceed toward a full-scale purge, his words and actions since he entered the Oval Office last year indicate that he feels he’s empowered to do whatever he feels he needs to do. That’s just the way things go in Westeros.

The reality of this, fantasy fiction aside, is grave. The president, who is the nation’s top law enforcemen­t official, has routinely shown little respect for the independen­ce of bedrock institutio­ns. Tilting at Mueller is bound to set up a showdown among the three branches of the federal government.

Mueller entered the scene on May 17, 2017, after Trump had fired the Federal Bureau of Investigat­ion’s then-director, James Comey, during the Russia probe’s earlier innings. Comey has alleged that Trump requested that he drop an FBI investigat­ion of the president’s former national security adviser,

Whitaker is unlikely to line up as a supporter of Mueller’s ongoing probe. But Mueller had been in danger long before this

Michael Flynn. Mueller later indicted Flynn.

Although Whitaker has argued that Mueller has somehow gone rogue in his investigat­ion, the special counsel was granted a broad investigat­ive mandate. In addition to collusion, he has also been looking into possible obstructio­n of justice by the Trump camp as well as the Trump Organisati­on’s business dealings — all of which is well within his mandate. Trump, and his proxy, Whitaker, simply don’t like the mandate, much as they don’t like Mueller.

Democrats can now reinforce Mueller’s probe, which Trump has no doubt seen coming long before today. Now he’s revealed his hand, putting the majesty and integrity of the presidency — along with the nation’s long-standing respect for the separation of federal powers — on the line.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates