Debate rages on ‘West’s double standard’ on terror labelling
dubai — New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has been hailed on social media by Muslims around the world for her response to two mosque shootings by a white nationalist who killed 50 worshippers. She wore a headscarf at the funerals in line with Islamic custom and swiftly reformed gun laws.
Yet for many Muslims, Ardern’s most consequential move was immediately labelling the attack an act of terrorism.
That stands in contrast to numerous ideologically-motivated mass shootings in North America by white non-Muslim gunmen that were not labelled acts of terrorism, say Muslim leaders and terrorism experts.
For too long, terror attacks have been depicted as a uniquely Muslim problem, with acts of violence described as “terrorist only when it applies to Muslims”, said Abbas Barzegar of the Council on American Islamic Relations.
“We’ve got an issue in this country where anytime a violent act is committed by a Muslim, the media starts at terrorism and then works backward from there,” added Colin Clarke, a senior research fellow at The Soufan Center, a New Yorkbased think tank.
It’s the opposite when the shooter is non-Muslim and white, said Clarke, who’s spent his career studying terrorism, particularly Muslim extremism.
The March 15 attacks on the New Zealand mosques raised questions about whether Islamophobia and the threat of violent right-wing extremism was being taken seriously by politicians and law enforcement.
The gunman in the New Zealand massacre called himself a white nationalist and referred to President Donald Trump as “a symbol of renewed white identity”.
The Anti-Defamation League found that right-wing extremism was linked to every extremist killing in the United States last year, with at least 50 people killed.
The group said that since the 1970s, nearly three in four extremist-related killings in the United States have been linked to domestic right-wing extremists and nearly all the rest to Muslim extremists.
“It’s really important that this attack not be dismissed as some crazy lone wolf, isolated incident,” said Dalia Mogahed, who leads research at the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding, an organisation that focuses on research of American Muslims.
“I think it needs to be seen as ... a symptom of a wider problem, a transnational rising threat of white supremist violence where antiMuslim rhetoric is the oxygen for this movement,” she said.
A study by the ISPU found that foiled plots involving Muslims perceived to be acting in the name of Islam received 770% more media coverage than those involving perpetrators acting in the name of white supremacy.
Another study by Georgia State University found that out of 136 terror attacks in the US over a span of 10 years, Muslims committed on average 12.5 per cent of the attacks, yet received more than half of the news coverage.
Mehdi Hasan, a commentator, TV host, columnist and adjunct professor at Georgetown University, said the public has been conditioned since the 9/11 attacks to see terrorists “as people with big beards, brown skin, loud voices shouting in Arabic”.
“I don’t think anyone can deny that the entire War on Terror has fed into this idea (of) Muslims as a threat, as ‘the other’, as inherently violent,” Hasan said.
Additionally, when non-Muslim white gunmen are the perpetrators of violence, there are often attempts at examining their mental health or childhood in ways not consistently afforded to others, Hasan said.
Some of the most notorious recent attacks by white assailants with racist or extremist views— the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting that killed 11 people in October and the church shooting that killed nine black worshippers in Charleston in 2015 — were not labelled terrorism and the assailants were not tried as terrorists. Neither was the shooting by a white assailant at a mosque in Quebec, Canada, in 2017 that killed six Muslims.
Clarke, the terrorism expert, said he’s been called to testify on Capitol Hill three times in the past two years about terrorism. “Where are the hearings about right-wing violence?” he asked.
Mogahed, who co-authored a book called “Who Speaks for Islam: What a Billion Muslims Really Think” based on interviews with tens of thousands of Muslims around the world, said it’s important to ask whether someone needs to be speaking for Islam, particularly when other groups of people are afforded the presumption of innocence when horrific acts are carried out in their name.
The public has been conditioned since the 9/11 attacks to see terrorists as people with big beards, brown skin, loud voices shouting in Arabic. I don’t think anyone can deny that the entire War on Terror has fed into this idea (of) Muslims as a threat
Mehdi Hasan, A columnist