ANTI-SATELLITE WEAPONS: RARE, HIGH-TECH, AND RISKY TO TEST

The indigenously produced interceptor used to destroy an object in orbit is a weapon which allows for attacks on enemy satellites — blinding them or disrupting communications — as well as providing a technology base for intercepting ballistic missiles

India needed to build antisatellite weapons because adversary China has already done it in 2007. More than anything I would say through this India is sending a message to the subcontinent. India is saying that we have mechanisms for space warfare

Ajay Lele, senior fellow at the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses

PREVIOUS TESTS

> The United States performed the first anti-satellite tests in 1959, when satellites themselves were rare and new

> Bold orion, designed as a nucleartipped ballistic missile re-purposed to attack satellites, was launched from a bomber and passed close enough to the explorer 6 satellite for it to have been destroyed if the missile had been armed.

> The Soviet Union performed similar tests around the same time. In the 1960s and early 1970s, it tested a weapon that could be launched in orbit, approach enemy satellites and destroy them with an explosive charge, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists, a non-profit research and advocacy organisation

> In 1985, the United States tested the AgM-135, launched from an F-15 fighter jet, destroying an American satellite called Solwind P78-1

> There were no tests for more than 20 years

> Then in 2007, china entered the anti-satellite arena by destroying an old weather satellite in a high, polar orbit.

> The test created the largest orbital debris cloud in history, with more than 3,000 objects, according to the Secure World Foundation, a group that advocates sustainable and peaceful uses of outer space.

> In 2008, the United States carried out operation Burnt Frost, using a shiplaunched SM-3 missile to destroy a defunct spy satellite

DEBRIS

> Debris from anti-satellite tests can create problems for other satellites and spacecraft in orbit, as tiny bits of junk whiz through space many times faster than a rifle bullet

> The international Space Station, for example, regularly tweaks its orbit to avoid debris of all kinds > china’s 2007 test is considered the most destructive. Because the impact took place at an altitude of more than

800km, many of the resulting scraps stayed in orbit

> The US test in 2008 did not create as much orbital debris, and because it was at a lower altitude, atmospheric drag caused much of it to fall toward Earth and burn up

> india’s foreign ministry said its test was done in the lower atmosphere to ensure there was no debris in space and that whatever was left would “decay and fall back onto the Earth within weeks”

MILITARY USE

> destroying an enemy’s satellites, which can provide crucial intelligence and communications in war, is considered an advanced capability

> With the successful test on Wednesday, india theoretically holds other countries’ satellites at risk

> Neighbouring Pakistan, with which India traded airstrikes last month, has several satellites in orbit, launched using Chinese and Russian rockets

> But china, which put dozens of satellites in orbit in 2018 alone, according to state media, could see India’s fledgling capability as more of a threat

> india needed to build anti-satellite weapons “because adversary china has already done it in 2007”, said Ajay Lele, senior fellow at the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses.

> “More than anything I would say through this India is sending a message to the subcontinent,” he added. “India is saying that we have mechanisms for space warfare”—