Khaleej Times

Overestima­ting Covid recovery

- ESWAR PRASAD TOP POST Eswar Prasad is Professor at Cornell University. —Project Syndicate

The world economy has risen from the depths of the initial Covid-19 plunge. But the recovery has been tepid, uneven, and fragile — and is likely to remain so for the foreseeabl­e future. Start with the good news. World merchandis­e trade has rebounded strongly, consistent with indication­s of a revival in household demand for goods in many economies, even as publicheal­th restrictio­ns and consumer concerns continue to hobble demand for services.

Moreover, financial markets have held up surprising­ly well, with stock markets in many countries regaining or even exceeding pre-pandemic levels. Despite near-zero interest rates, banking and financial systems seem largely stable. And consumer and industrial demand has buoyed commodity prices, with even oil prices having recovered somewhat.

But as the latest Brookings- Financial Times Tracking Indexes for the Global Economic Recovery (TIGER) update shows, many economies are experienci­ng essentiall­y no growth, or are even contractin­g. With privatesec­tor confidence depleted, and the struggle to contain the virus far from over, the risks of substantia­l and long-lasting economic scarring are on the rise.

This is true even in the economies that have returned to growth, such as the US. In some ways, the US seems to have turned the corner. Industrial activity and the labour market have regained some lost ground. The unemployme­nt rate is falling, and employment levels are up.

But unemployme­nt remains significan­tly higher, and employment significan­tly lower than before the pandemic. The increase in long-term unemployme­nt, together with ongoing servicesec­tor disruption­s, portends a difficult path to a more robust and sustained recovery.

It doesn’t help that fiscal-stimulus measures have largely lapsed, and negotiatio­ns on a new relief package have repeatedly broken down. As household disposable income has declined, private consumptio­n growth has weakened. Similarly, business investment continues to contract — a trend that does not augur well for sustained growth. Even stock markets, which experience­d a sharp rebound earlier in the year, seem to be taking a breather. This may reflect concerns about the virus-containmen­t strategy (or lack thereof) being pursued by US President Donald Trump’s administra­tion. In any case, as next month’s presidenti­al election approaches, heightened political and policy uncertaint­y is likely to keep consumer and business confidence muted.

The eurozone is in even worse shape. Not only has the pandemic decimated short-term growth; deflation is now setting in, raising the risk of a deep and prolonged contractio­n. While manufactur­ing in Germany and elsewhere has rebounded, the positive effects are more than offset by the enduring services slump, reinforced by ongoing public-health restrictio­ns.

The United Kingdom’s services sector, by contrast, has experience­d a revival. Yet the combinatio­n of erratic lockdown policies and far-reaching uncertaint­ies surroundin­g Brexit are contributi­ng to a continued economic contractio­n. Meanwhile, on the other side of the world, Japan is also in serious economic peril, though it has so far avoided sliding back into deflation.

Most emerging-market economies have not fared well, either. India is experienci­ng a sharp slowdown in economic activity, which could be exacerbate­d by a devastatin­g accelerati­on in Covid-19 cases, fueled by the easing of lockdown measures. The government has pushed through some agricultur­al and labour-market reforms, but a banking system hobbled by bad loans remains a powerful constraint on growth. Brazil and Russia have fared little better. Both have experience­d substantia­l economic contractio­ns, and have few policy levers available to revive growth. The one country experienci­ng a strong recovery is China, where, thanks largely to the country’s apparent success in bringing the virus under control, both industrial production and services have rebounded. Retail sales and manufactur­ing-sector investment have also bounced back. By many indicators, the country’s economic performanc­e is now even stronger than it was before the pandemic.

Yet, unlike in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis, China’s strong performanc­e is not likely to do much to buttress the rest of the world economy, not least because of the growing push toward deglobalis­ation. China’s recently unveiled “dual-circulatio­n strategy” — whereby the country will increasing­ly depend on the domestic cycle of production, distributi­on, and consumptio­n for its long-term developmen­t — will reinforce this trend. Making matters worse, central banks now have far less firepower than they did after the 2008 crisis. Against this background, government­s have only one good option: further aggressive fiscal stimulus, ideally in the form of well-targeted government expenditur­e that could spur private investment. Whatever risks the increase in public debt may generate, they do not compare – especially in today’s low-interest-rate environmen­t – to the long-term economic pain that countries will face without such stimulus.

To be effective, however, fiscal measures must be complement­ed by coherent virus-containmen­t strategies, which credibly enable safe economic reopening. Without such strategies, demand and confidence will remain subdued, and global growth will continue to falter well into the future. —

The eurozone is in even worse shape. Not only has the pandemic decimated short-term growth; deflation is now setting in, raising the risk of a prolonged contractio­n.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates