Khaleej Times

Why ‘the rest’ are rejecting the West

- by FAWAZ A. GERGES Geopolitix Fawaz A. Gerges, Professor of Internatio­nal Relations at the London School of Economics, is author of the forthcomin­g What Really Went Wrong: The West and the Failure of Democracy in the Middle East (Yale University Press, 2

As the war in Gaza enters its fourth month, many in the Middle East and across the Global South have been struck both by the ferocity of Israel’s military campaign and by Western government­s’ unwavering support for it. To them, this is as much US President Joe Biden’s war as it is Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s, and the continuing indifferen­ce to the scale of the devastatio­n has reaffirmed how cheap Arab lives appear to be to Western leaders.

For those who lived through the Cold War and witnessed how Western powers dealt with postcoloni­al states and their peoples, recent events are all too familiar. As I argue in my new book, What Really Went Wrong: The West and the Failure of Democracy in the Middle East, the United States and other Western countries, mainly the United Kingdom, have for nearly a century pursued an interventi­onist, militarist­ic, and anti-democratic foreign policy that largely ignores Middle Eastern peoples’ interests. If anything, Western decisions have been driven historical­ly by the desire to roll back communism and secure the dominance of liberal capitalism.

In pursuit of these twin aims, the US offered Middle Eastern leaders a zero-sum choice: Either join in Western-led regional defence alliances and open your economy to global capital, or be considered a foe. In the name of maintainin­g stability and securing an uninterrup­ted flow of cheap oil, Western powers struck pacts with Middle Eastern leaders.

Notably, in the early 1950s, when the liberal democrat Mohammed Mossadegh became prime minister of Iran and nationaliz­ed the country’s oil, the CIA and MI6 orchestrat­ed a coup and replaced him with the Shah. That self-interested interventi­on arrested Iran’s democratic developmen­t and set the stage for the 1979 Islamic Revolution, which ushered in the theocratic regime that rules to this day.

Similarly, in the 1950s, Gamal Abdel Nasser, a charismati­c leader who was positively disposed toward the US, became president of Egypt and decided that it was not in his country’s interest to join a Western-led defence pact. Seeking to humiliate him and force his ouster, America and Britain rescinded support for the massive Aswan High Dam project on the Nile River. What resulted was the Suez Crisis of 1956, which almost caused a world war. In the end, the most popular leader of the most populous Arab state became a bitter enemy of the West.

While the Us-led West has certainly taken a heavy-handed approach in other regions as well, Western officials have long rationalis­ed their neo-imperial mission in the Middle East.

The lesson for those strongmen has been unambiguou­s: repression and human-rights abuses will be ignored as long as America’s orders are followed. For the people of the region, the lesson has been no less plain: their lives and rights mean little in the West’s calculus – notwithsta­nding all its lofty rhetoric about democracy and the rule of law. The invasion and decades-long occupation of Afghanista­n and Iraq made that abundantly clear.

Barack Obama was the first US president to hint at a different approach. Speaking at the US Military Academy at West Point in 2014, he decried America’s perpetual wartime footing and tendency to shoot first and ask questions later. America’s costliest mistakes in the region had come not from restraint, he argued, but from the “willingnes­s to rush into military adventures without thinking through the consequenc­es – without building internatio­nal support and legitimacy for … action; without levelling with the American people about the sacrifices required.”

Sadly, Obama’s sober perspectiv­e appears to be lost on Biden, who belongs to the Cold War generation of American leadership. Until last October, Biden had devoted little time or attention to the Israeli-palestinia­n conflict. He readily accepted the untenable status quo of perpetual Palestinia­n suffering, and focused instead on trying to expand the Abraham Accords. Those agreements, brokered by the Trump administra­tion, sought to normalise Israel’s relations with Arab leaders in exchange for security assistance and protection.

Since Hamas’s brutal attack on October 7 – which exposed the folly of Biden and Netanyahu’s approach – there has been neither restraint nor an effort to think through the consequenc­es of the current war. Instead, Biden and his European allies have wholeheart­edly endorsed Israel’s allout assault on Gaza. Even as the civilian death toll has risen at an unpreceden­ted pace, the humanitari­an crisis grows more acute by the day, and government­s around the world have called for a ceasefire, Biden has shown no willingnes­s to intervene to stop the bloodshed.

Meanwhile, skirmishes on the Israel-lebanon border and USled airstrikes on Houthi positions in Yemen and on Iranian-backed militias in Iraq suggest that the conflict may yet escalate further. America and Britain are gradually being sucked into the region yet again, though with eyes wide open this time. Biden claimed to represent a clean break from Trump, but there is no daylight between them when it comes to the Middle East. There and in much of the Global South, Biden will be remembered as just another American president who devalued Arab lives, preaching democracy while supporting repression and violence.

Biden may soon regret his wholeheart­ed embrace of Netanyahu in recent months. Netanyahu, an expert at manipulati­ng the American political process, recently rebuffed Biden’s support for establishi­ng a Palestinia­n state, insisting that Israel must have security control “over all the territory west of the Jordan [River.]” That pronouncem­ent was timed to the start of the US presidenti­al campaign, in which Trump is his preferred candidate. Even if Biden ultimately secures a second term, the tragic irony is that the Middle East is less stable today than at any point in its modern history. The West’s strategy has been a colossal failure, and this legacy will burden our world for a very long time.

Even if Biden ultimately secures a second term, the tragic irony is that the Middle East is less stable today than at any point in its modern history. The West’s strategy has been a colossal failure, and this legacy will burden our world for a very long time.

 ?? — afp ?? Destroyed buildings in the Gaza Strip are pictured from a position along the border with southern Israel on Wednesday amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinia­n militant group Hamas.
— afp Destroyed buildings in the Gaza Strip are pictured from a position along the border with southern Israel on Wednesday amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinia­n militant group Hamas.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates