The National - News

The solid science behind the dream of floating icebergs to Fujairah

The UAE’s Ministry of Energy has confirmed that there are no plans to tow icebergs from Antarctica to Fujairah for fresh water. But why not, asks Jonathan Gornall? After all, the idea has a long and illustriou­s history

- Jonathan Gornall is a frequent The National contributo­r to

One dark and foggy night in July 2004, I was working up a sweat on the oars of a stateof-the-art rowing boat, edging its way across the Grand Banks east of Newfoundla­nd, when the hairs on my neck stood on end.

There were four of us, rowing in pairs, attempting to break the record for crossing the Atlantic from west-to-east. A few days earlier, we had stood on Signal Hill above St John’s and watched an iceberg sail past the mouth of the harbour.

Viewed from the safety of that vantage point, the monstrous offspring of some distant Arctic glacier appeared awesome. Now with its kin, unseen in the fog but its chilling presence betrayed by a sudden drop in temperatur­e, the adjective that sprang more readily to mind was sinister. My rowing partner and I shipped our oars and strained our ears. From nearby came the inexplicab­le sound of water lapping against a shoreline – inexplicab­le because we were miles from land. The “shore”, we realised, was that of an invisible iceberg. Unlike the , we would

Titanic survive our encounter with an iceberg – our own sinking would take place a month later, at the hands of a storm some 250km south-west of Ireland. The fury of that storm was something to behold, but over the years the memory of it has dulled. What has remained undiminish­ed, however, is the sense of awe engendered by that unseen iceberg, the possessor of a kind of terrible kinetic energy and the very embodiment of that wild twilight zone in which human enterprise, for all our ingenuity, falls short.

It was that sense of helplessne­ss in the face of one of nature’s most extraordin­ary manifestat­ions that came to me when I read recently of a plan to harvest Antarctic icebergs and tow them north to the Gulf as a source of fresh water.

The “bizarre” plan, as it was described in the UK media, had been mooted by the National Advisor Bureau, a business start-up consultanc­y based in Abu Dha- bi. In fact, towing icebergs from Antarctica to Fujairah was just one of several “what if” ideas for solving the UAE’s water problems first outlined in

Filling the , a book published Empty Quarter in September 2015 by Abdulla Alshehi, the electronic­s engineer who founded the bureau.

Curiously, the late- breaking “news” coincided with the review of the final draft of the national water security strategy by the UAE’s Ministry of Energy, which felt the need to issue a statement that, “as the authority in charge of water affairs, it would like to confirm that such news is just a rumour”.

So that’s that, then. But should it be?

Icebergs, the product of snowfall, consist of fresh water, and the possibilit­y of tapping that potential has been recognised for decades. For the UAE, which relies on the energy- intensive process of desalinati­on for its water, the lack of natural sources could prove to be economical­ly restrictiv­e as the nation continues to grow. Comparison­s could, and should, be made with other sustainabl­e technologi­es, in the developmen­t of which the UAE is playing a key role. Even a few years ago, who would have expected wind and solar power to play the significan­t role around the world they do today?

One of the earliest plans to harvest water from icebergs surfaced in 1949, as a proposed solution to California’s aridity. John D Isaacs, a professor at the Scripps Institutio­n of Oceanograp­hy, outlined a scheme to tow an eight-billion-tonne iceberg, some 35km long, from Antarctica to San Diego. Off California, the iceberg would be surrounded “with a floating fence of impermeabl­e material” from within which “the water can then be pumped from the fresh water lake that forms”. The scheme evaporated, but dreamers continued to dream. In 1973 the US National Science Foundation sponsored a report by scientists at the Rand Corporatio­n into the feasibilit­y of exploiting “Antarctic icebergs as a global fresh water resource”. Reams of calculatio­ns were produced to demonstrat­e not only that it would be feasible to drive gigantic iceberg trains through the water, using nuclear- powered electric propellers fixed at intervals along the ice, but also that doing so would be ecological­ly harmless and considerab­ly less expensive – in cash and environmen­tal effect – than relying on desalinati­on to generate the same amount of water.

The conclusion of the extensivel­y researched and highly technical paper was that there was “no obvious insurmount­able obstacle”.

Four years later, in October 1977, delegates from around the world gathered at Iowa State University for the First (and, as it would turn out, the last) Internatio­nal Conference on Iceberg Utilisatio­n for Fresh Water Production. The conference was sponsored by, among others, Prince Mohammed Al Faisal of Saudi Arabia, who had a large block of ice flown in from Alaska as a PR stunt. The purpose of the conference, he told the media, was “to confirm our opinion that [icebergs] can be transporte­d and that it can be done without any ecological difficulti­es at costs that are reasonable and in quantities that make a difference”.

As H Guyford Stever, former director of the US National Science Foundation and science adviser to presidents Nixon and Ford, put it, this was “big science” at its best, “a new and challengin­g conjunctio­n of oceanograp­hy, meteorolog­y, glaciology, solid mechanics and fluid mechanics with the technologi­es of ship design and operations at sea in hot and cold climes”. As an ambition, he added, it was on a par with the space programme and all that was required now was “risk-taking, not only from the science and technology standpoint, but also as an entreprene­urial venture”.

It all led nowhere. Why? Politics and economics, probably. Ever since the embargo imposed by Opec countries in retaliatio­n for US support of Israel during the 1973 war, oil prices had been in an upwards spiral, which would continue for years. Oil-rich Saudi Arabia, though one of the countries with the greatest need for an alternativ­e to desalinati­on, was under no great economic pressure to find one.

Forty years on from the Iowa conference the landscape of the Gulf, and the environmen­tal consciousn­ess of the entire world, has changed considerab­ly. Back then the UAE was just six years old, a new nation finding its feet. Today it is one of the most influentia­l players in the region, not only on account of its oil, but also thanks to its record of imaginativ­e commitment to entreprene­urial and technologi­cal initiative­s at the cutting edge of the global drive to sustainabl­e living.

But it also faces a looming reality. Whatever emerges in the energy ministry’s awaited national water security strategy, the starting point is clear: in the uncomforta­bly near future, the UAE will need more water than it can afford to make.

What better home, then, than the UAE for the rebirth of the startling concept of mining water from icebergs, to be hauled 8,500km in a straight shot from Antarctica to the coast of Fujairah, and what better people to pull off such an audacious scheme than the dreamers who built towering cities where once was only sand?

Dreamers such as Abdulla Alshehi, perhaps. As he remarked in in

Filling the Empty Quarter 2015, “All it takes is creativity and a bit of courage”.

‘ There is ‘no obvious insurmount­able obstacle’ to towing icebergs

 ?? Photo courtesy of Aurora Expedition­s ?? Could icebergs from Antarctica be part of the solution for long-term water security in the Arabian Gulf?
Photo courtesy of Aurora Expedition­s Could icebergs from Antarctica be part of the solution for long-term water security in the Arabian Gulf?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates