The National - News

Trump gets tough with Pakistan

US concern over border bases for Afghanista­n attacks

- Rob Crilly Foreign Correspond­ent

NEW YORK // The United States is considerin­g an increase in drone strikes in Pakistan and cuts in aid to Islamabad to protect Afghanista­n from cross-border attacks.

Militant havens in Pakistan have long exercised US policy makers desperate to end America’s longest running war. They accuse Islamabad of destabilis­ing Afghanista­n by allowing groups such as the Taliban-allied Haqqani network to operate bases in its tribal areas along the mountainou­s border. The Trump administra­tion is now considerin­g expanding drone strikes, redirectin­g or withholdin­g American aid to Pakistan and even downgradin­g its status as a major non-Nato ally.

“We’ve never really fully articulate­d what our strategy towards Pakistan is. The strategy will more clearly say what we want from Pakistan specifical­ly,” a US official said. As the US prepares to send 4,000 more troops to Afghanista­n, the problem of Pakistan is once again in sharp focus.

Pakistan has worried since the 1970s that any growth in Indian influence in Kabul could leave it vulnerable to attack from two flanks. As a result, successive Pakistani government­s and its mil- itary have been sympatheti­c to militant Islamist groups which they see as protecting their interests. Critics accuse Islamabad of allowing such groups to use Pakistani soil to plot attacks against American and Afghan forces across the border.

Suspicions linger about how much Pakistani leaders knew about the presence of Osama bin Laden in the military town of Abbottabad.

The Pakistani military points to Operation Zarb- e- Azb, launched in 2014 to flush out groups in North Waziristan, and to its cooperatio­n in rounding up Al Qaeda leaders after 9/11 as evidence that it is doing its best in difficult circumstan­ces.

That has not satisfied American commanders who believe Pakistan is underminin­g hopes of a stable Afghanista­n.

Lt Gen Vincent Stewart, director of the Defence Intelligen­ce Agency, told US senators: “They hold in reserve terrorist organisati­ons so that if Afghanista­n leans towards India, they will no longer be supportive of the idea of a stable and secure Afghanista­n that could undermine Pakistan interests.”

The scale of the problem was highlighte­d at the end of last month when a tanker bomb exploded in the centre of Kabul, killing more than 80 people close to internatio­nal embassies. Afghanista­n accused the Haqqani network of carrying out the attack with assistance from Pakistani security services, which Pakistan denies.

Such accusation­s strengthen the hand of those who want Pakistan to do more to rein in the Haqqani network and even argue that Islamabad should be declared a state sponsor of terrorism.

They say treating Pakistan as an ally and sending military aid has not worked.

Before becoming senior director for South and Central Asia at the National Security Council, Lisa Curtis co- authored a report with Husain Haqqani, Pakistan’s former ambassador to Washington.

Its recommenda­tions now appear to provide a blueprint for current White House thinking.

“Accordingl­y, the objective of the Trump administra­tion’s policy toward Pakistan must be to make it more and more costly for Pakistani leaders to employ a strategy of supporting terrorist proxies to achieve regional strategic goals,” they wrote.

“There should be no ambiguity that the US considers Pakistan’s strategy of supporting terrorist proxies to achieve regional strategic advantage as a threat to US interests.” They said Pakistan should be stripped of its position as a major non-Nato ally within six months, a status that allows priority access to US surplus equipment, unless it shows it is committed to American counter-terrorism objectives. They also recommende­d increasing drone strikes, helping to strengthen the civilian government against the country’s powerful generals, setting out a timeline of steps to be taken against militant groups and enforcing counter-terrorism conditions on military aid.

Last year, the Pentagon decided not to pay Pakistan $300 mil- lion (Dh1.1 billion) in Coalition Support Funds after Ash Carter, then defence secretary, declined to sign authorisat­ion that Pakistan was taking adequate action against the Haqqani network. Afghan leaders have long pushed Washington to adopt a tougher stance on Pakistan.

“I believe there will be a much harder US line on Pakistan going forward than there has been in the past,” said Hamdullah Mohib, the Afghan ambassador to the United States.

 ?? AP Photo ?? A US Predator drone over Kandahar air base in 2010.
AP Photo A US Predator drone over Kandahar air base in 2010.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates