Sarin gas used in attack on town in Idlib
Report identifies chemical but fails to apportion blame
THE HAGUE // An investigation by the international chemical weapons watchdog confirmed that sarin nerve gas was used in a deadly April 4 attack on a Syrian town. But the report, released yesterday, stopped short of saying who was responsible.
The attack on Khan Sheikhoun in Idlib province in Syria killed more than 90 men, women and children.
The incident sparked outrage around the world as distressing photos and video of men, women and children dying in the aftermath were broadcast.
“I strongly condemn this atrocity, which wholly contradicts the norms enshrined in the chemical weapons convention,” said Ahmet Uzumcu, director general of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. “The perpetrators of this horrific attack must be held accountable for their crimes.”
Russia, however, immediately dismissed the findings.
“We must state that [ the report’s] findings are still based on rather questionable data,” the foreign ministry in Moscow said. “It is not surprising that the contents of the report by the special mission of the OPCW are in many ways biased, which suggests that political motivation is present in the actions of this organisation.”
The US and its allies blamed the Moscow-backed Syrian military for the attack and launched a punitive strike days later. Russia has suggested that rebel fighters were implicated in the attack, which the West is using as a pretext for bringing about regime change in Syria. Syrian president Bashar Al Assad has denied using chemical weapons.
The findings of the investigation will be used by a joint United Nations-OPCW investigation team to assess who was responsible for the attack. The OPCW has scheduled a July 5 meeting of its executive council to discuss the matter.
After the report was circulated, the US state department said: “The facts reflect a despicable and highly dangerous record of chemical weapons use by the Assad regime.”
Only some details of the report were released to the public.
Mr Assad’s staunch ally, Russian president Vladimir Putin, said earlier this month that he believed the attack was “a provocation” staged “by people who wanted to blame” Mr Assad, while the Russian foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, said the report did not back US claims that the sarin was dropped from aircraft.
“They don’t know how the sarin ended up there, yet tensions have been escalating for all these months,” Mr Lavrov said.
British foreign secretary Boris Johnson said that while the report did not apportion blame, “the UK’s own assessment is that the Assad regime almost certainly carried out this abominable attack”.
Russia also criticised the OPCW for not sending experts to the attack site instead of analysing samples from victims and survivors and interviewing witnesses.
The Syrian government joined the OPCW in 2013 after it was blamed for a deadly poison gas attack in a Damascus suburb. On joining, Mr Assad’s government declared about 1,300 tons of chemical weapons and precursor chemicals that were destroyed in an unprecedent- ed international operation. But the organisation still has unanswered questions about the completeness of Syria’s initial declaration, meaning that it has never conclusively been able to confirm that the country has no more chemical weapons.
The investigative team responsible for the report has previously concluded “with a high degree of confidence” that chlorine and sulphur mustard, commonly known as mustard gas, had been used as weapons in Syria.