UK pushes to name and shame agents of chemical weapons
US accuses Russia of hampering moves to bolster global watchdog’s powers, with vote expected today
Britain moved yesterday to close a gap in the regimen banning the use of chemical weapons, by giving the international watchdog the power to name states it believes are responsible for illegal attacks.
A British-led proposal – backed by countries including Germany, France and the United States – wants to bolster the role of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) amid a rise in the use of devices in Syria and elsewhere in the world.
Britain pushed for expanded powers for the OPCW after a nerve agent attack on a former Russian spy on UK territory in March, which resulted in a titfor-tat series of diplomatic expulsions by the two sides and their allies.
“We now owe a duty to the world to seize the opportunity that this meeting provides to uphold and strengthen that ban, so that chemical weapons are truly banished to the past,” said the UK Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson.
The meeting comes as the organisation prepares a report on a poison attack on Douma, near Damascus, Syria, in April that killed dozens and triggered air strikes by the US, France and Britain.
Western governments have blamed Syrian President Bashar Al Assad and military backer Russia of using chemical weapons and protracting the dispute. Both countries deny using chemical weapons.
The OPCW, which oversees a 1997 treaty banning the use of toxins as weapons, has the technical expertise to assess what chemical weapons were allegedly used but does not currently have the powers to apportion blame.
A UN-OPCW team, the Joint Investigative Mechanism, previously held the responsibility of trying to identify those behind chemical weapons attacks in Syria. It concluded that Syrian government troops had used the nerve agent sarin and chlorine bombs.
But the body was disbanded last year after Russia used its veto power on the UN Security Council to refuse to extend its mandate.
“The widespread use of chemical weapons by Syria in particular threatens to undermine the treaty and the OPCW,” Gregory Koblentz, a non-proliferation expert at George Mason University in the US, told Reuters.
The special meeting called to discuss bolstering the OPCW’s powers was delayed after Russian, Iranian and Syrian representatives raised a series of procedural points yesterday.
“One delegation has made it quite clear ... they intend to dispute everything,” said Kenneth Ward, the US ambassador to the OPCW, during heated exchanges between the rival blocs.
Russian representative Alexander Shulgin denied it was using “procedural tricks” to hold up the debate on expanding the powers of OPCW – a move it opposes.
“We’re not trying here to be a stumbling block,” he said. “Before we cross the Rubicon, we want to understand where the stepping stones are.”
Despite the Russian filibustering, the UK-led intervention will result in a vote today involving more than 140 nations attending the special session in The Hague, Netherlands.
If the UK is successful in persuading more than twothirds of the nations to back the measures, it would thrust the 20-year-old OPCW to the centre of the dispute between western powers and Russia over the use of chemical weapons.
The vote comes after relations between London and Moscow fell to their lowest level for years after the attempted murder of Russian former double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury, England.
While the weapons have been used most commonly in Syria, they have also been used since 2012 in Iraq and Malaysia, where the half-brother of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, Kim Jong-nam, was assassinated with VX nerve agent in February last year.