US MAKERS OF DRIVERLESS CARS MUST GET PAST LEGISLATIVE SPEED BUMP
▶ Bill stalls in Senate as the world drives on with new road technology, writes David Millward
For US car makers, hopes of overtaking the rest of the world in the industry’s next big thing are riding on a piece of legislation that safety advocates say is flawed and endangers the public.
Technology companies such as Google and major vehicle makers including Ford have invested heavily to create driverless vehicles in which control is transferred from a human being to a computer.
With other countries already well on course to introduce self-driving vehicles on public roads, the bill before the Senate would allow the same to happen across the United States.
Although 29 of the 50 states enacted laws to allow the testing of self-driving cars on public roads, supporters of the technology believe federal legislation is essential if such vehicles are to become a reality across the US.
The American Vision for Safer Transportation through Advancement of Revolutionary Technologies Act — better known as the AV Start Act – is before the Senate and has bipartisan support.
Should the bill become law it would remove the requirement for vehicles to be fitted with equipment needed for human control of a car, such as a steering wheel. It would also order that vehicle standards are subject to federal jurisdiction rather than being the responsibility of individual states.
This would pave the way for manufacturers to start building and selling the cars.
With Transport Secretary Elaine Chao sympathetic to the proposals, getting the bill through Congress is the last legislative hurdle the technology faces. There is little doubt that President Donald Trump will sign the bill.
John Thune, a Republican senator from South Dakota and one of the sponsors of the bill, believes the measure would enable to law to keep up with the technology.
“By playing a constructive role in the development of self-driving transport systems, our government can help save lives, improve mobility for all Americans – including those with disabilities – and create new jobs by making us leaders in this important technology,” he said.
But safety groups want to apply the brakes after a number of accidents involving self-driving, or to give them their correct name, autonomous vehicles.
They cite incidents such as the death of Elaine Herzberg, a pedestrian who was run over and killed while wheeling her bicycle across a road in Tempe, Arizona because the self-driving Uber – equipped with radar and Lidar, which uses laser for sensing objects – did not “see” her.
“A lot of well-paid lobbyists from the technology and auto industries are trying to ram this bill through Congress,” said Jason Levine, executive director for the Centre for Auto Safety in Washington.
He said the bill in its current form “provides no oversight, regulation or protection for the consumer”.
With the Republican majority under threat from midterm elections in November, “the industry is worried that a Democrat-controlled Congress would pass a bill with regulatory teeth”, Mr Levine said.
“Our concern is this bill is a pro-industry blank cheque to introduce still-unproven technology. It does not require safety standards and removes consumer rights if they are harmed by a potentially defective product.
“Let’s not replace driver error with computer error.”
Despite the bipartisan support for the bill, a Democrat version would inevitably be stricter when it comes to regulations. Safety campaigners would expect provisions demanding that the cars’ sensors demonstrate they are capable of “reading” road signs and markings as well as detecting pedestrians and cyclists.
It was expected that the Thune bill would be tacked on to other legislation to ease its passage through Congress, but that route has been blocked off, leaving the sponsors looking for other ways of getting the legislation passed.
With the bill seemingly stalled in Washington, other countries are vying to take the lead in what is seen as becoming a lucrative industry over the next few decades.
Internationally, the United Nations is trying to impose some common standards on what otherwise would be a hotchpotch of regulations.
In 2016, the UN updated the 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic to take into account the move towards self-driving cars.
Put simply, the changes endorse self-drive technology, as long as the computer can still, where necessary, be overridden by the driver.
In the UAE Mercedes-Benz ran a successful trial of a self-driving car in November 2016, when it completed the 139-kilometre journey from Dubai to Abu Dhabi.
Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid, Vice President and Ruler of Dubai, has said 25 per cent of journeys in the UAE should be driverless by 2030.
In this trial, the driver did not control the accelerator or steering wheel but was required to signal when the vehicle changed lanes.
But there is evidence that the public as a whole is rather more cautious about the technology than politicians, judging by a poll of 20,000 drivers taken by the AA, Britain’s largest motoring organisation.
Just over a fifth of respondents said they would be happy to surrender control of a vehicle to a computer. About the same number said they would feel safe if other cars on the road were autonomous.