HOW PENSION FUNDS ARE FAILING WOMEN
▶ The retirement savings gap is widening due to Covid-19, leaving female workers in a precarious financial position
Even before Covid-19 shut down economies around the world, many women faced retirement with less in savings than men. Now, that gap is set to widen further in some of the world’s biggest pension systems.
Women already typically earn less than men and take more time off work to have children, resulting in diminished pension pots. And as coronavirus lockdowns affect industries such as air travel, tourism, retail and hospitality, they face a disproportionate risk of losing their jobs, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
The policy response to the pandemic also risks exacerbating the problem. Some countries, including Australia, the US, Spain, Denmark and Canada are allowing people early access to their retirement funds to weather the crisis, raising concerns that women – who tend to live longer than men – are further depleting their savings.
“There is some indication that women could be more affected and that the pension gap would increase down the road,” says Maciej Lis, an economist in the OECD’s pensions and population ageing team in Paris. “The crisis seems to worsen the labour market prospect of women more strongly than men because women tend to work in more affected sectors.”
The issue is a further challenge for policymakers who are already grappling with how to provide for ageing populations. And it is exposing underlying flaws in pension systems designed to ensure people are financially secure in retirement without being dependent on welfare.
Despite its pension system being ranked the world’s third best behind the Netherlands and Denmark, women in Australia face retirement with 40 per cent less in savings than men, similar to the European Union average, according to Mercer. In the US, the shortfall is 32 per cent, according to the OECD.
A key problem in Australia is that the pension system, known as superannuation, is linked to paid work. Employers have to pay 9.5 per cent of a worker’s gross salary into a retirement fund each month – but the threshold for those payments being compulsory is a monthly income of A$450 (Dh1,185), meaning many lower paid and casual workers miss out.
“We have a very sophisticated retirement system that rewards those with an unbroken career track,” says Debby Blakey, chief executive of the Health Employees Superannuation Trust Australia, a A$52 billion pension fund in Melbourne with predominantly female members.
“The system doesn’t work for women who take time out of the workforce, women who work casually at times, parttime and it doesn’t put enough value on those years of unpaid work.”
The Covid-19 pandemic will amplify women’s unpaid work burdens, the OECD said in a report on the virus’s impact.
The Australian government is undertaking a review of the retirement savings system, and submissions have called for the A$450 threshold to be removed.
David Knox, a senior partner at Mercer in Melbourne, says the government could consider contributing to pensions while women take time off to take care of their families.
Countries doing better – such as Denmark and Sweden – compensate well for career breaks for childcare, a European Parliament report found. Most also have high levels of income redistribution. Denmark is among nations that have closed the retirement income gap to about 8 per cent, according to OECD data.
The report cites Greece, Italy and Spain as among countries facing risks when it comes to retirement savings for women. It highlights issues such as low female employment rates, a high proportion of women working part-time and high gender pay gaps.
Similar issues are at play in the US and now the negative economic effects of the pandemic are further threatening a financially secure retirement, especially for women, according to the Transamerica Centre for Retirement Studies.
In an April survey, fielded after several states issued stayat-home orders and large sections of the US economy were temporarily shut down, 25 per cent of women said their confidence in their ability to retire comfortably had dropped due to the pandemic, compared to 21 per cent for men. About 39 per cent of women are not saving for retirement, compared to 22 per cent for men.
Among women, 24 per cent said they have no savings in a qualified retirement account that they can access if they are in financial stress, compared to 12 per cent for men.
“Long before the pandemic, women already faced formidable challenges in saving and planning for retirement,” says Catherine Collinson, the centre’s chief executive.
“Any disruptions in employment, income and access to benefits for women are likely to widen the gap. Furthermore, given long-standing societal roles, women may find themselves more involved in homeschooling their children or being called upon to be a caregiver for an ageing parent or loved one.”
She called for changes to Social Security, including the provision of credits for unpaid time spent in caregiving roles.
Increasing levels of financial literacy could help. In a study last year, Fidelity International found that while Australian women worried about their financial future more than men, more than a third did not know how much they needed to retire. Mercer in the UK found that women were more risk averse, choosing more defensive pension investments that tend to have lower returns.
A survey by Russell Investments found that women in Australia were less engaged, with only 26 per cent making active investment choices versus 41 per cent of men. Superannuation funds need to tailor their approaches based on members’ individual goals, says Jodie Hampshire, managing director for Australia at Russell Investments.
“If they have a personalised approach to investment management, asset allocation, you can do more to help those women get into a better position for their retirement,” she says.
Smaller funds targeted at women are moving that way. FairVine Super, which started last year with the purpose of helping women narrow the retirement savings gap, is allowing members to reduce their fees by 50 per cent if they have been financially affected either through job losses or pay reductions from Covid-19, according to chairman Sangeeta Venkatesan.
Structural failings are going to be compounded by the Australian government allowing people affected by the pandemic to withdraw up to A$20,000 of their retirement savings early.
Female members between the ages of 18 and 24 who have claimed early release now have a median account balance of just A$1,049, a drop of 78 per cent, according to data from Blakey’s fund, Hesta.
“Withdrawing A$20,000 today could cost a woman anywhere between A$63,000 to A$200,000, depending on her current age, when she retires,” says Ms Venkatesan.
“In comparison, the impact is a lot less for men.”