The National - News

US is showing concern for situation in Palestine-Israel, but few are listening

- HUSSEIN IBISH Hussein Ibish is a senior resident scholar at the Arab Gulf States Institute and a US affairs columnist for The National

In the occupied Palestinia­n territorie­s – especially East Jerusalem and the West Bank – 2023 is shaping into a volatile year. As a consequenc­e, the normally sacrosanct US-Israeli relationsh­ip is headed into unusually choppy waters. The current flare-up of deadly violence will be hard to contain and the real question is, how bad will things get?

Last year was the most violent year in the West Bank since 2005, when the UN began keeping records of Palestinia­ns killed by Israeli occupation forces. Among the victims was the noted American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, who had been infuriatin­g Israeli authoritie­s for decades with her coverage of the occupation.

Despite a simmering insurgency among largely unaffiliat­ed armed Palestinia­n youth gangs such as the “Lion’s Den”, which emerged in response to routine Israeli attacks, especially night raids into supposedly autonomous Palestinia­n towns, relations between the US and Israel remained largely unaffected. Both US President Joe Biden and the Israeli coalition government led by former prime minister Naftali Bennett had every interest in supporting each other by not making waves in the bilateral relationsh­ip.

Lurking in the background was the mutually disliked right-wing Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu. In December, Mr Netanyahu pieced together the most extreme right-wing government in Israel’s history, bringing to power religious and nationalis­t extremists who have heretofore been considered anathema even by the Israeli far right.

Some of these figures, such as the new Minister of National Security, Itamar Ben-Gvir, appeared delighted by the sudden opportunit­y to throw petrol on the smoulderin­g embers. Within days of his appointmen­t, he made an official visit to the highly volatile Haram Al Sharif compound, which seemed modelled on Ariel Sharon’s similar intrusion in 2000 that sparked the Second Intifada.

That came just a few weeks after the Oslo peace process hit a dead end at the ill-fated and ill-conceived Camp David summit in July 2000. And since the equally ill-advised and quixotic quest for a meaningful Israeli settlement freeze during Barack Obama’s first term as US president, even the simulation of negotiatio­ns has been dropped.

Instead, for the past 23 years, the Israeli political scene has been moving relentless­ly away from any pretence of a commitment to a two-state solution and instead towards annexation, possibly combined with some level of expulsion of Palestinia­ns from parts of the West Bank to be officially merged with Israel.

Mr Netanyahu’s new government is thought to be preparing to transfer key governance powers in the occupied territorie­s from the occupation Civil Administra­tion to new ultraright-wing Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich. The Israeli government’s own senior legal advisers have warned that much of the rest of the world, including the Internatio­nal Court of Justice, would be likely to view such a step as de facto annexation – and rightly so.

While Israeli politics have been moving steadily towards annexation, Palestinia­n politics are just dead in the water. The Palestine Liberation Organisati­on (PLO) and Palestinia­n Authority gambled everything on negotiatin­g a two-state solution with the Israelis, who have apparently lost any inclinatio­n to move in that direction. And Hamas, which controls Gaza, has no answer other than the catastroph­ic and corrupt extremist misrule on full and horrifying display in the Palestinia­n enclave.

Yet a new generation of Palestinia­ns that lacks any memory of how damaging and self-defeating the Second Intifada was and has grown up without any framework of hope for citizenshi­p – in whatever country – and basic human rights, let alone self-determinat­ion, finally appears to be taking the initiative. Believing they have nothing to lose and unmoored from attachment to establishe­d and discredite­d political movements, both secular and extremist from the PLO to Hamas and even Palestinia­n Islamic Jihad, these angry and desperate young men are playing their gruesome roles in a tragedy of grim inevitabil­ity.

Human beings, no matter their ethnicity, culture or religion, simply will not accept a long-term and open-ended future of total subordinat­ion to another people, especially in their own land and in relatively equal numbers.

The violent relationsh­ip between Israelis and Palestinia­ns is hard-wired and structural.

A reversal of this essential relationsh­ip of dominance and subordinat­ion between the two identity groups would produce roughly the same behaviours on both sides.

The deepest tragedy is that the Israeli extreme right seems to be counting on Palestinia­n rage and desperatio­n to provide them with the opportunit­y to go as far as they can in their twin goals of annexation and expulsion. Not only will Israel impose the usual collective punishment­s of home demolition­s and mass lockdowns following the recent violent Palestinia­n attacks (though never in response to Jewish ones), but extremist cabinet ministers have also demanded official recognitio­n for a set of unauthoris­ed settlement outposts “in retaliatio­n” for attacks against Israelis.

Never mind that there is no logical connection whatsoever between any rational response to violence and recognisin­g wildcat settlement­s.

It is just an excuse. Unfortunat­ely, the enraged Palestinia­n youths involved are not likely to reflect on what else they are likely to provide the rationalis­ation for as reciprocal violence intensifie­s.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who visited the region this week, knows that he and Mr Biden have little leverage over Mr Netanyahu, especially since they seem to be oddly disincline­d to publicly recognise that Palestinia­ns are suffering under a military occupation. The Israeli Prime Minister, in turn, has little leverage over his more radical cabinet colleagues. Palestinia­n President Mahmoud Abbas has, if anything, even less leverage over the youths driving the Palestinia­n side of the cycle of violence that Israeli extremists are counting on.

The US is right to show concern, but neither side is really listening. The past 10 years suggest that, as things stand, Israel can be slowed, but not deterred, from creeping steadily towards annexation, intensifyi­ng the status quo of systematic, formalised inequality between Jews and Palestinia­ns in the occupied territorie­s.

Many Jewish and other Americans, especially Democrats, are increasing­ly unable to support or ignore this reality, especially since it is coupled with efforts by fundamenta­lists in Israel to exclude many Jewish Americans from the Israeli or even Jewish fold on denominati­onal or ancestral grounds.

Republican­s, driven by apocalypti­c evangelica­l Christians, may not care, but as long as the US has a Democratic administra­tion and Israel has a fundamenta­list, racist and annexation­ist government, the traditiona­lly inviolable “special relationsh­ip” will be imperilled.

Mr Netanyahu, Mr Biden and Mr Blinken will strive to paper over this growing schism, but it’s likely to grow considerab­ly wider by the end of this dangerous year.

Many Jewish and other Americans are increasing­ly unable to ignore the reality of growing schisms

 ?? Reuters ?? Former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, right, jokes with former Palestinia­n leader Yasser Arafat while both are hosted by then US president Bill Clinton at Camp David in 2000
Reuters Former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, right, jokes with former Palestinia­n leader Yasser Arafat while both are hosted by then US president Bill Clinton at Camp David in 2000
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates