The National - News

WHAT THIS YEAR’S US ELECTION MEANS FOR YOUR INVESTMENT­S AND RETURNS

▶ Political and economic factors will propel the current bull market,

- experts tell Harvey Jones

Investors wondering how much further the global stock market rally can go might want to take a lesson from history, because share prices appear to be following a tried and trusted pattern.

Basically, they are copying the US electoral cycle, according to Tom Stevenson, investment director at fund manager Fidelity.

The US S&P 500 is up 28 per cent in the past year – and it is not the only index booming today. “From India to Japan and Europe too, shares are hitting new highs as the bull market goes global,” Mr Stevenson adds.

This chimes with the fouryear cycle of returns that markets typically deliver around the US presidenti­al election.

Historical­ly, the first two years after an election are poor, as the White House pushes through more unpopular measures, Mr Stevenson says. “Then, after the midterm elections, markets tend to pick up as the incumbent president does what they can to get re-elected.”

So far, Democratic President Joe Biden’s term is matching that template. “Last year was a barnstorme­r for the US market and 2024 has started strongly too,” Mr Stevenson adds.

If he is right, we can expect the bull run to continue at least until election day on Tuesday, November 5, when voters will almost certainly face a repeat run-off between Mr Biden and Republican Party candidate Donald Trump.

After that, hold on to your hats. But is it that simple?

Jason Hollands, managing director of fund platform Bestinvest by Evelyn Partners, says there is plenty of evidence to back this up. There have been 19 election years since the Second World War and the S&P 500 has delivered a positive return in 17 of them.

The exceptions are 2000, when George W Bush defeated Democratic Party candidate Al Gore against the backdrop of the bursting dot-com bubble, and 2008, when Barack Obama swept to power during the financial crisis.

The easy answer is that incumbent presidents typically “juice” the economy to boost their election hopes, Mr Hollands says. “It may also reflect growing investor optimism about the pledges being made and the prospect of welcome change.”

Smaller and medium US companies typically do better in election years, which Mr Hollands says may reflect the fact that they have a greater exposure to the domestic market.

At the same time, bigger companies tend to have an internatio­nal focus. “A broadening of the US stock market rally beyond the so-called Magnificen­t Seven mega-cap tech stocks would be very healthy,” Mr Hollands says.

Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, also sees strong economic and political reasons why the current bull market will continue.

“America is spending money like it’s going out of fashion. The $1.7 trillion deficit racked up in the fiscal year to September 2023 was the third biggest on record, and an even bigger number is on the cards for 2024. This is boosting the economy and corporate profits, but whether it is it sustainabl­e is an open question,” Mr Mould says.

Monetary policy can also play a part, he adds.

“US Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell won’t want to oversee a recession during an election year. Markets remain convinced the Fed is poised to sanction half a dozen interest rate cuts in 2024, starting in March.”

However, Vijay Valecha, chief investment officer at Century Financial, suggests that the best part of the bull run may now be over.

Since 1928, Wall Street has delivered an average 6.63 per cent in the first year of a presidenti­al term and 3.33 per cent in the second year.

It is year three where the action is, with an average return of 13.96 per cent, which slows to 7.37 per cent in year four.

The US S&P 500 jumped 25 per cent in 2023, Mr Biden’s third year. If history repeats itself, we can expect more modest growth this year. But that is still growth.

We should not write off 2025, either. Since 1970, Wall Street has enjoyed a notable post-electoral bounce, raised hopes and driven fresh policies, Mr Hollands says.

“In Mr Trump’s first year, the S&P 500 posted a 21.8 per cent return as tax cuts got delivered. It rallied 28.8 per cent in Mr Biden’s first as the US economy – awash with stimulus – rebounded from Covid.”

Mr Hollands says a triumphant Mr Trump could extend the tax cuts enacted in his first term, which are due to expire by 2027, and deregulate parts of the economy.

While that would be a boost for markets, his trade policy is a wild card.

Mr Trump has pledged a universal tariff of 10 per cent on all imports, along with retaliator­y tariffs on any country that applies tariffs on US exports and up to 60 per cent tariffs on Chinese imports.

“It’s difficult to know how these might play out for stock markets, but it clearly injects a degree of uncertaint­y,” Mr Hollands says.

Mr Trump is also a climate change sceptic who could boost the US oil industry with his pledge to continue drilling, Mr Hollands says. “Defence companies could suffer given Trump’s isolationi­sm and reluctance to continue funding Ukraine.”

While Mr Trump has floated the idea of cutting the corporate tax to 15 per cent, from today’s 21 per cent, Mr Biden may raise it to 28 per cent, Mr Valecha says.

“Mr Biden also proposes an increase in taxes on stock buy-backs and plans to make it harder for businesses to exploit internatio­nal tax regulation­s to evade US taxes,” he says.

Yet, markets may not always respond in the way we expect, Mr Valecha adds.

“Studies show that in years when corporate tax rates were

S&P 500 has delivered a positive return in 17 out of the 19 US election years since the Second World War

increased, the S&P 500 delivered a better return than when they were reduced.”

There is one more element to consider. Is politics just noise and should investors let it wash over them and focus on their portfolios?

Mark J Higgins, an authority on the subject and author of US Financial history: Understand­ing the Past to Forecast the Future, says only three US presidents have had a major direct impact on the country’s economy: Andrew Jackson, who abolished the US national bank in 1836; Franklin D Roosevelt, who pulled the US out of the Depression in the 1930s; and Lyndon Johnson, whose Great Society programme led to a surge in federal spending and debt.

Mr Biden and Mr Trump don’t figure at all.

“We overestima­te the impact of politics on markets. There is an awful lot of shouting. Investors need to tune it all out,” Mr Higgins says.

 ?? Talib Jariwala / Getty Images ??
Talib Jariwala / Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates