YOUR VIEWS

Ian Fisk said: “It’s a good idea if it works. The fishery can control who gets to fish the place, keep a check on what they are doing and protect fish stocks. Can’t see it happening to more than a handful.”

Dave Cheetham: “Another example of the few spoiling it for the many! Why people can’t follow fishery rules, take litter home and behave appropriately is beyond me. Fisheries wouldn’t then have to do this.”

John Neville: “So anyone from outside the area wanting to fish there now can’t – I think it’s bonkers.”

Rick Clark: “If this becomes reality, how do we get new people/kids into the sport? I’m sure that people/parents won’t want to pay a hefty joining fee.”

Steve Porter: “The Glebe has been members-only for years and is one of the best fisheries in the country. You can’t stock and look after a complex of that size based on the odd angler turning up when they feel like it.”

Stewart Wilson: “Places have been built on day-ticket anglers’ money. Now they are doing well they are turning away the people that got them where they are. This will lead to more people fishing fewer places as they need special memberships for each lake at costs that are unsustainable. Now I’ve said that, if I had my own lake it would be membership-only. It’s much easier to manage, leads to having much better anglers, less fish damage, and better water quality.”

Joe Taylor: “It would be sad for many match and pleasure anglers who like to travel and fish different waters all the time. I’ve fished at least 15 different venues this year.”

Chris Telling: “Maybe a good move for a lot of anglers, as people will feel a sense of belonging, and therefore look

after the fishery more.”