Bath Chronicle

No longer law to have cabinet rule

- David Kernek

That B&NES Council has chosen to stick with the cabinet system of governance, an unwelcome legacy of the Blair years, is not disappoint­ing because there was little reason to hope that the Lib Dems would be sufficient­ly radical to restore the structure that empowered and rendered elected ward councillor­s accountabl­e in decision-making.

The council chooses to give the impression that it cannot by law restore committee governance. Its How does the Cabinet work? informatio­n sheet (dated October 31, 2019) states: ‘Legislatio­n introduced in 2002 required the Council to institute “Executive” (Cabinet) decision-making.’

That was the case in 2002, but it is not now. The 2011 Localism Act permitted local councils in England to restore the committee system if they wanted to do so.

It’s clear that, like the Conservati­ves in Bath, the Lib Dems want to keep decision-making to a 10-person Politburo, leaving local ward councillor­s – the backbenche­rs – to get a look-in when they can or whenever they’re interested enough.

Significan­tly, that How does the Cabinet work? informatio­n sheet makes no attempt to explain the relationsh­ip between the cabinet and backbench ward councillor­s in decision-making. It gets one desultory reference, in Paragraph 6:

‘How is consultati­on ensured? In the case of Cabinet decisions, other councillor­s and the public may make representa­tions or ask a question at the meeting to influence the cabinet before they consider the issue.’

Can we look to the council to, at the very least, to correct the grossly false impression it attempts to convey in its ‘informatio­n’ paper? B&NES is no longer required by law to have cabinet governance.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom