BBC History Magazine

Masterful on the Mongols

FRANK MCLYNN applauds a vast study of how the Mongol empire’s relationsh­ip with Islam was transforme­d

- Yale, 640 pages, £30 Frank McLynn’s books include Genghis Khan (Bodley Head, 2015)

Genghis Khan’s decision to divide his domain between his four sons was not supposed to break up his empire, but inevitably that was what happened. Although his grandson Kublai ruled the Yuan empire (China and Mongolia), the other three sectors – the Ilkhanate (roughly Iran), the Jagatai khanate (central Asia) and the Golden Horde (Russia) – became independen­t kingdoms in all but name. Even more astonishin­gly, given Genghis’s annihilati­on of the Muslim empire of the Shah of Khwarezmia, stretching from Iraq to Afghanista­n, within 100 years of this shattering psychologi­cal blow to Islam, the three western Mongol kingdoms had converted to the religion of Muhammad. In a massively scholarly, compendiou­s survey, Peter Jackson, well known as one of the most eminent living students of the Mongols, traces this transforma­tion.

So why did western Mongols convert to Islam (while China and Mongolia embraced Buddhism, Confuciani­sm and shamanism)? There can be many answers – intermarri­age, the excellence of Muslims as administra­tors, basic Mongol religious tolerance – but for Jackson the principal factor was military security. The western Mongol rulers did not relish ruling a sullen and disaffecte­d Muslim population, so made their own life easier by adopting the majority religion of their subjects; that made more sense than bloody attempts at religious persecutio­n. Genghis’s famous legal code, the yasa, which forbade many Islamic customs, like halal butchery and circumcisi­on, was quietly ignored, even as his descendant­s in Iran and central Asia paid lip service to his heritage.

One curious consequenc­e of the mass conversion was that Genghis’s most famous successor, Timur, tried to restore his entire empire as a single realm but in the name of Islam. Jackson has little time for Timur, whose conquests were said to have led to 17 million deaths, but there is no doubt that by his time the crescent, not the shamanisti­c worship of the god Tengeri, was the dominant religion. Timur was actually on his way to the conquest of China when he died in 1405.

Jackson underlines the many consequenc­es of Mongol Islamisati­on: principall­y economic boom and Asian integratio­n, triggered by a simple taxation system and a sophistica­ted distributi­on of loans to merchants. But he has no time for the traditiona­l idea of the pax Mongolica – supposedly a halcyon period in which caravans could pass from China to Europe without being attacked. Jackson argues that the main factor in that economic golden period was in fact vastly increased seaborne commerce. He also has little regard for other myths about the later Mongol period, such as that the Black Death originated in China or the western khanates.

Jackson’s overall summary is masterly. Unlike most iconoclast­s, he has formidable erudition and intellectu­al elan to buttress what might seem at first surprising and even eccentric arguments, and this reader, at least, emerged convinced by his theses. The book is not an easy read but, persevered with, produces something like a mother lode of Mongolica.

Mongol rulers did not relish ruling a sullen Muslim population

 ??  ?? Genghis Khan (c1167–1227) and two of his four sons in a 13th- century depiction
Genghis Khan (c1167–1227) and two of his four sons in a 13th- century depiction
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom