BBC History Magazine

Family values

CATHERINE FLETCHER is disappoint­ed by an unoriginal take on one of history’s most infamous dynasties

- Catherine Fletcher is associate professor in history and heritage at Swansea University

The Medici by Mary Hollingswo­rth Head of Zeus, 528 pages, £35

The Medici are a fascinatin­g family. First documented in the 13th century, they rose to power on the back of a banking fortune. With “snares, traps and deceits” they made themselves de facto rulers, then lords of Florence. It’s a thrilling story, and this is a beautifull­y presented book, packed with gorgeous art images. Sadly the historical content does not live up to the packaging.

Mary Hollingswo­rth’s pitch is that the Medici were the bad guys, and she makes a decent case for it with tales of their sometimes murderous misdeeds. But Medici misconduct isn’t news, and her claim that Lorenzo the Magnificen­t’s corruption “rarely makes its way into the annals of Medici history” is overplayed. It’s more than a decade since the PBS documentar­y Godfathers of the Renaissanc­ee compared the family to the Mafia, and the current TV show Medici: Masters of Florence is hardly more salubrious: it prompted one Medici descendant to complain it traduced his ancestors’ memory.

Out-of-date scholarshi­p is, unfortunat­ely, a consistent problem with this book. Hollingswo­rth tells us it’s “likely” that Cardinal Ippolito de’ Medici died of malaria, but that is not supported by the documents from the murder investigat­ion, discussed in a 2010 biography. She also insists, against the latest research, that Alessandro de’ Medici was Pope Clement VII’s illegitima­te son. This will only be definitive­ly settled by scientific testing, but the documentar­y evidence points elsewhere. In the past 10 years, a wealth of new books on the Medici have been published, on topics ranging from political culture to the family’s relationsh­ip with Machiavell­i, perception­s of the Americas and patronage of the Jesuits. As far as I can tell, none of this work has informed The Medici. Readers hoping for an up-to-date synthesis of the historical research (some of it only available in Italian, behind paywalls, or in expensive university library editions) are destined to be disappoint­ed.

The Medici women are also notable for their absence. While the men of the family get individual chapters, Catherine de’ Medici, queen and regent of France (and arguably the family’s single most powerful member), does not; nor does the other French queen of the family, Marie. Maria Magdalena of Austria and Christine of Lorraine fare marginally better, but by and large the women feature as wives and mothers. It’s true that Florentine politics were male-dominated (even by the standards of the day), but

Medici women are notable in the book for their absence

women could and did exercise informal power in political life and as artistic or religious patrons. Maddalena and Simunetta, the two enslaved women who bore illegitima­te children to Medici men, are not even dignified with names. Problems with the documentar­y sources for these women do not excuse this absence.

As far as the Medici men are concerned, Hollingswo­rth presents a clear and straightfo­rward, if somewhat dated, narrative of political events and alliances. She also argues the Medici were less significan­t patrons than they are often portrayed as. It’s an interestin­g point, but to be convincing this book needed much greater attention to the new research and the broader social context.

 ??  ?? A painting depicting the marriage of Christine of Lorraine. The role of the Medici women is underplaye­d in a new book on the dynasty, says Catherine Fletcher
A painting depicting the marriage of Christine of Lorraine. The role of the Medici women is underplaye­d in a new book on the dynasty, says Catherine Fletcher
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom