Bristol Post

Masks may be here to stay - but hugging will return

- John HOUSEMAN bristolpos­tnews@localworld.co.uk

FACE coverings may stay for many in the future - but hugging loved ones will quickly return to the norm when safe to do so in 2021, according to behaviour experts.

The coronaviru­s crisis has led to drastic changes in people’s behaviour with everyday practices like handshakes replaced with elbow bumps and social distancing a crucial tool in curbing transmissi­on.

Dr Nilu Ahmed, a behavioura­l psychologi­st at the University of Bristol, said it was likely people would quickly return to hugging family and friends - although she expects people to be more cautious about contact like shaking hands in formal settings.

“When it comes to our closer networks, there’ll be no change in that behaviour, we’ll go back to what we’ve been missing,” she said.

“But when we’re around strangers, there will be much more caution that people will adopt.”

Linda Bauld, professor of public health at the University of Edinburgh, acknowledg­ed that the widespread wearing of face coverings was a “big shift” for the UK.

“All these countries that had SARs and MERs adopted face coverings and then they never gave them up,” she told the PA news agency.

“Particular­ly during the colder months when there are more respirator­y viruses circulatin­g, or when people are worried about pollution.

“It’s a big shift for the UK. “Some people really hate them and will be keen to get rid of them, but I think people who are more cautious probably will continue to wear them.”

She thought it unlikely they would become as widespread as in southeast Asian countries, adding: “But I think it will be socially acceptable for people to wear them; people are not going to stare or make fun of people if they do.”

Prof Bauld said some short term changes, like physical distancing, would not be longer-term, with people returning to hugging and shaking hands when they felt comfortabl­e to do so.

Meanwhile, one expert said more regular hand-washing and using antibacter­ial gel could become a permanent change in behaviour and help reduce the spread of other diseases in the population.

Dr Flavio Toxvaerd, a specialist in the economics of infectious diseases at the University of Cambridge, said another positive longterm change is countries being forced to adopt new technologi­es in response to the pandemic.

“And I think that’s going to be an irreversib­le change that is going to have far reaching consequenc­es for the way we work, and the way we travel, and the way we go to school,” he said.

“So, some of these changes might have been inevitable and would have occurred anyway down the line.

“But in some senses, the epidemic has forced us into trying new things.”

Stephen Reicher, a member of the behavioura­l science advisory group to the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencie­s (Sage), said the past year had demonstrat­ed the importance of being connected to others.

❝When it comes to our closer networks ... we’ll go back to what we’ve been missing Dr Nilu Ahmed

Reflecting on the pandemic, he said adopting and putting emphasis on the term social distancing at the beginning of the crisis was a “real mistake”.

Prof Reicher, of the University of St Andrews, said: “Because we don’t want to socially distance, we want to spatially distance.

“If you don’t connect people, it has huge impacts on mental health, and if you do connect people, it gives them huge strength and resilience.

“We found new ways of connecting.

“If this pandemic happened 20 years ago, before the internet, I think it would have been very, very different indeed.”

Prof Bauld said that while a positive side to the new measures could be realising the “unnecessar­y energy expended on maintainin­g relationsh­ips that they don’t need to”, those who were particular­ly isolated during the pandemic could remain more so.

“We just need to keep an eye on those kind of mental health and other issues I think well into 2021,” she added.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom