Bristol Post

Listed Pub conversion plans attract objections

- Estel FARELL-ROIG estel.farellroig@reachplc.com

AWe are appalled to read that ‘the interior listing is outdated’ ...There is no planning history of any authorised alteration­s to the building since it was listed in 1994 and an inspection and detailed audit of the building’s interiors is essential, to determine what features still remain

PLANNING applicatio­n has been submitted to turn a Stokes Croft pub into shops and apartments.

51 Stokes Croft was last occupied by pub No51 but is not currently in use, according to the documents submitted to Bristol City Council.

The applicatio­n states the property is no longer seen as financiall­y viable as a pub by the owner, who wants to turn the ground floor into two shops and the upper parts into four onebedroom apartments.

The Grade II listed building has been used as a pub since 1860 and includes a Georgian-style frontage, according to the documents, which would remain “largely unchanged” by the proposals.

The applicatio­n states: “The property owner is keen to retain qualities and character of the listed building and this specifical­ly applies to the frontage of the building complete (which represents the only remaining item of any heritage value).”

It adds: “Given the minimal nature of the changes to areas of heritage value, the location of the new interventi­on area with care in design and constructi­on, we therefore conclude that the impact of the proposals will be minimal.”

However, the Montpelier Conservati­on Group has submitted

Montpelier Conservati­on Group

an objection to the proposals, stating that their understand­ing is that before the pandemic the pub was popular and appeared viable.

It says that the applicant has not provided the necessary evidence to justify the loss of a pub, which is a requiremen­t under the Site Allocation and Developmen­t Management Policies (2014).

The group continues: “We are appalled to read that ‘the interior listing is outdated.

“The dogleg stair, moulded string and panelled doors etc have been removed at some stage in the past.’

“There is no planning history of any authorised alteration­s to the building since it was listed in 1994 and an inspection and detailed audit of the building’s interiors is essential, to determine what features still remain.

“While the unauthoris­ed removal of the details mentioned in the listing may not have happened during the current ownership of the building, there is no time limit on enforcemen­t action for listed buildings and responsibi­lity rests with the current owner.

“These applicatio­ns cannot be determined until this matter has been fully investigat­ed and resolved.”

The Conservati­on Advisory Panel has also written to the council to object to the plans, giving similar reasons to the Montpelier Conservati­on Group.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom