Burton Mail

Theme park sacks guard

ALTON TOWERS EMPLOYEE HAD USED AN UNROADWORT­HY COMPANY CAR IN PURSUIT

- By RUARAIDH BRITTON ruaraidh.britton@reachplc.com

ALTON Towers has sacked a security guard after he was found to be continuall­y pursuing “shoplifter­s” in his “unroadwort­hy” company vehicle after it had been hit by a fleeing VW Golf.

Merlin Attraction­s Operations, which runs the Staffordsh­ire theme park, found Martin Hughes guilty of gross misconduct.

This verdict came after it ruled his vehicle was unroadwort­hy following the collision.

It was also found he had committed several driving offences as he was not wearing a seatbelt, he was using his mobile phone while driving, and he was using emergency lighting on a public highway.

Mr Hughes, who had worked at the resort since 2018 and was regarded as a role model with an exemplary record, lost his appeal against the dismissal and took his former employer to an employment tribunal after suggesting he may have been concussed.

But the tribunal dismissed his claim for unfair dismissal.

The appeal found his driving dangerous but cleared him of the three other allegation­s. The tribunal heard

that Mr Hughes had been intentiona­lly blocking an exit when his vehicle was rammed by suspected shoplifter­s in August 2020.

But without checking the condition of his vehicle, Mr Hughes went off in pursuit of the Golf which had children inside - he was suspended the next day.

Employment judge Christophe­r Gaskell has ruled: “The evidence available to the respondent clearly suggested that the claimant was aware that the vehicle had been involved in a significan­t collision.

“If he was not actually aware of the damage, at the very least, he acknowledg­ed that he should have checked for damage before driving the vehicle onto the highway.”

The judge added: “Such incidents are what he was employed to deal with.

“The claimant’s response on this occasion of driving so dangerousl­y; so unnecessar­ily; without regard for his own safety or that of other people, clearly and reasonably undermined the respondent’s confidence in his ability to do his job in the future.”

 ?? ?? The security guard lost his appeal for unfair dismissal at an employment tribunal
The security guard lost his appeal for unfair dismissal at an employment tribunal

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom