Campaign UK

Reshaping Adland

Pine all you want for the Mad Men era of advertisin­g, when the rise of television paid for liquid lunches and a tagline could still resonate with the same power as an internet-breaking Kardashian selfie. Those days are gone, but new technology, digital di

-

Consumptio­n Today, the fate of the advertisin­g industry may rest on its ability to conform to a 5-inch screen. The smartphone has spurred a cultural revolution in the way people consume and create their own media, as well as how they interact with brands. Mobile now accounts for more than 50 percent of the world’s internet traffic, according to We Are Social’s “Digital in 2017 Global Overview.” Social media is also a major contributo­r to this shift. The Pew Research Center reports that 7 in 10 Americans are on some form of social media, with approximat­ely three-quarters of users on Facebook and around half on Instagram visiting these sites at least once a day. “Digital broke the paradigm of advertisin­g and of agencies,” says Barry Wacksman, EVP, Global Chief Strategy Officer, R/GA. “If you go back to the early to mid-1990s, all ads lived in traditiona­l media: TV, radio, or print. The web was the first multiconte­xtual media format: reading, shopping, sharing, conversing, etc. Now, with the smartphone, the number of things people can do becomes almost infinite.” All of this is not only pulling people away from their television sets, but enabling them to take control of their consumptio­n. According to a Mckinsey & Company report, millennial­s in North America are 10 percent less likely to take out a cable subscripti­on than older consumers, and are four to five times as likely to purchase goods and services using their mobile phones. The passive consumer has become the active participan­t. Digital technology, like music and video streaming, has brought with it certain expectatio­ns—that everything be delivered instantane­ously, frictionle­ssly, and on a highly personaliz­ed level. Digital culture has given way to a new set of consumer habits that are causing a decline in many of the industries that have traditiona­lly kept advertisin­g afloat. The hyperconve­nience of Amazon is killing retail, automotive is reeling from the proliferat­ion of ride sharing, and major soft-drink companies and grocery chains are getting slammed by private-label, artisanal providers for the same reason fast food is drowning: Consumers’ increasing awareness of health and wellness over the last decade—amplified by our ability to self-track—has made quality and nutrition a priority. Now that everyone has a voice, it’s no longer a one-way conversati­on between brands and consumers. As people talk back, they are, to a significan­t degree, dictating how they want to be marketed to. Reaching this empowered audience is no longer as simple as grabbing that primetime 30-second spot. Which is why every conscious traditiona­l agency has been rethinking their marketing strategies and stubborn ones are awaiting obsolescen­ce. Ad dollars tell the whole story, since spending generally follows where the audience directs their eyeballs. In late 2016, total digital ad spending surpassed total TV ad spending for the first time, according to emarketer. As today’s disruptive products and services continue to stoke consumer expectatio­ns of convenienc­e, personaliz­ation, and on-demand gratificat­ion, returns on traditiona­l placements in television and print will continue to wane, and advertiser­s will have to expand their offerings to cater to the fast-growing digital ecosystem and the rising number of people who participat­e in it. Disruption So where are these ad dollars going? The focus is now on search and social. The numbers indicate that two tech giants, above all others, are capitalizi­ng on this consumptio­n shift from television to mobile. As the largest, most centralize­d platforms with the most personaliz­ed services, Facebook and Google already dominate up to 85 percent of all digital ad dollars and in the third quarter of 2016 captured a staggering 99 percent of digital advertisin­g growth, Forbes recently reported. Amazon’s mammoth presence in tech is having its own ripple effect on advertisin­g, although not in an ad-buying sense. Its position as a distributi­on outlet for brands, combined with its growth as a content creator and streaming platform and its disruptive Alexa-enabled devices, is creating a range of opportunit­ies and challenges for advertiser­s. Armed with functional ecosystems, endless personaliz­ation, and all the behavioral data artificial intelligen­ce could ever sift through, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, and Netflix have become optimal venues upon which to engage consumers. These tech innovators are leveraging the hold they have on digital to encroach on the creative space that has been, for so long, strictly agency territory. Through their own homegrown efforts, tech giants are attempting to disrupt the agency model by taking creative work inhouse and then essentiall­y giving it away to clients in exchange for hefty ad buys. Google’s Zoo and Facebook’s Creative Shop are two well-known examples that are leading the charge. To meet these new challenger­s, agencies must offer a wider range of capabiliti­es, rather than simply rely on the traditiona­l campaign. R/GA’S model, for instance, consists of an integrated suite of services, all connected by design: Venture Studios; Consulting; Products and Services; Communicat­ions; Content and Prototype studios; Connected Spaces; and IP. This ecosystem of capabiliti­es allows R/GA to serve clients in a variety of ways and meet their innovation needs across their entire business. But even the brands that pay are becoming a threat to the agencies. Some such as Sprint, Chipotle, and Coca-cola are starting their own in-house creative studios. Aided by the rise of digital and social platforms, these brands are adopting the same DIY mentality in content creation that their consumers display on a daily basis. Red Bull Media House, launched in 2007, serves as the advertisin­g arm for the popular energy drink, focusing on print,

TV, and digital media. Apple started its own in-house agency in 2014, from which Verizon recently hired a creative director to run its own. By taking back major portions of work normally handled by a roster of agencies, brands hope to significan­tly cut costs, boosting their bottom line while also assuming greater creative control over the messages and stories they want to deliver to their customers. The idea that no one knows a product or service better than the company creating it could be a scary one for agencies, but the jury is still out on whether brands can truly go it alone.

Innovation

Consultanc­ies are attempting to enter the marketing-services space through a strategy of acquisitio­n, absorbing digital agencies left and right, but their ability to integrate those services into their core business remains to be seen. Between late 2014 and mid-2016, Accenture acquired 40 marketing firms, Forbes reported, which led Advertisin­g Age to name Accenture Interactiv­e the largest and fastest-growing digital agency network worldwide in 2016. That same year, IBM acquired three online ad agencies in the span of a week, and Deloitte also got in on the act, acquiring the full-service ad agency Heat. The enormous amount of big data available to corporatio­ns is enabling new targeting methods for brands to implement and providing opportunit­ies for tech-savvy consultanc­ies to eat into advertiser­s’ revenue. Well-versed in online marketing, app developmen­t, and e-commerce, consultanc­ies have proven their ability to meet their clients’ digital needs and are now throwing their financial weight around to compensate for their creative shortcomin­gs. “The changing business landscape means marketers are demanding scale and business partners that can provide IT skills across everything from data to analytics to customer service,” Avi Dan, CEO of consulting firm Avidan Strategies, wrote in Forbes. These are the kinds of services that corporatio­ns typically look to big name consultanc­ies to provide. What these consultanc­ies may have lacked in creative capital in the past they more than make up for in financial capital that lets them not only merge with or acquire digital shops but also to poach talent from other creative agencies. “Just doing ideation and acting as creative vendors is not enough,” Dan wrote. “If you want to have an impact, you need to own the high-level business strategy.” The traditiona­l consultanc­y model often ends at recommenda­tion, in the form of a Powerpoint; the ability of consultanc­ies to execute is still in question. Owning both ideation and implementa­tion is the major differenti­ator. Some agencies have already begun to fight back. To survive a complete takeover and thrive in this evolving digital space, some are building out consultanc­y practices of their own. Over the past several years, R/GA has been developing its consulting capability with the goal of transformi­ng businesses and disrupting convention­al consulting along the way, already helping companies such as Siemens and ESPN enhance consumer experience­s and develop growth strategies. Three former executives from the agency David&goliath recently formed a new shop, called Wolfgang Digital, to bridge the gap between creative and strategic consulting. “Most challenges with our clients are getting to the point where they can’t be solved with advertisin­g alone any longer,” says R/GA’S Wacksman. “Their biggest challenge is with innovation. It’s not which ad to run, but what’s the right product, service, or experience for the marketplac­e as it exists today? The biggest step is forming a bridge from consulting to design and execution.” And the question now becomes: Can the top creative agencies do consulting better than the major consultanc­ies do creative?

 ??  ?? Photo: Naim Chidiac
Photo: Naim Chidiac

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom