Chichester Observer

Face-to-face appointmen­ts

-

I was surprised to read your report in the Thursday, November 4, edition of the visit by Andrew Griffith MP to Petworth surgery.

We moved into the area about a year ago and registered with the surgery. The administra­tive, medical support staff and doctors have been excellent in our experience and the pharmacy service is a real boon.

Our dealings with the surgery have always been civil and friendly.

However, on the specific issue of face-toface appointmen­ts my

understand­ing is that the policy of the surgery is that everyone must have a first ‘triage’ telephone appointmen­t and cannot decide themselves that a face-to-face appointmen­t is needed.

Indeed this triage appointmen­t is not really an appointmen­t at all but rather is a telephone call from a doctor sometime during that day or half day.

If the policy of the surgery is as stated in your article, that a patient ‘who wants a face-to-face appointmen­t can get one’ then I would suggest that this needs to be communicat­ed clearly to patients.

I have no problem with telephone appointmen­ts

(if they have at least an approximat­e timing) for most purposes but I see no reason to go through an additional and potentiall­y wasteful (to the doctor) triage process first when the patient knows perfectly well in the vast majority of cases whether a telephone appointmen­t is likely to be adequate (if necessary in discussion with admin staff ).

I also see a useful place for simple email exchanges instead of some appointmen­ts.

I would urge the surgery to place trust in their patients and their admin staff and allow patients to decide.

This would also allow the return of on line appointmen­ts with the attendant saving of staff and patient time waiting on the telephone or calling at the surgery.

RICHARD GUY Duncton, Petworth

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom