Classic Dirtbike

Super Profiles

PROFILE E A works TRIBSA Though still fielding machines based on production bikes, the UK team for 1966 had some good kit.

- Words: Tim Britton Pics: Nick Haskell

Take one stunning bike, do some indepth research and write it all down here, in our Super Profile bit. When BSA went Triumph.

To perform well on the world stage was always the aim of the UK’S motorcycle industry throughout its existence and the Internatio­nal Six Days Trial was tailor made for this purpose. When it was launched in 1913 the idea behind the event was to showcase what ordinary, or lightly modified machines could do and as such our home industry embraced it. Gradually though, the focus of the twowheeled world changed and motorcycle­s became leisure vehicles rather than transport, but the UK industry soldiered on with lightly modified road bikes for the national teams. Or at least they did until the mid-sixties when things had to change. In effect the home industry was BSA Triumph and it was their supported riders who made up the teams. Good though these riders were, they were often handicappe­d by their machinery, but they still put up excellent performanc­es.

The thing is, within the industry existed the wherewitha­l to create machines that could perform well, Jeff Smith for instance was still at the top of the world and for 1966 he was the reigning world champion on a BSA Victor and Triumph’s unit twin engine could easily slot into this chassis, as John Giles proved. Why didn’t the team consist of bikes built to this ideal? Company politics is why. BSA was not keen to see its chassis fitted with a Triumph engine nor was Triumph all that happy about the suggestion its bikes were inferior to BSA. The point was both makes were under the same ownership and surely that was the main thing? Hmmm well… As each factory continued to try and scupper the project it seemed common sense had gone out of the window. One of the biggest bugbears for the BSA guys was the weight of the Triumph engines and that the cast iron barrels on them would distort under hard use. Triumph was adamant that the barrels couldn’t be cast in alloy.

In scenes worthy of a spy movie, BSA called Triumph’s bluff when it cast alloy cylinder blocks for the unit twin engines after Meriden said it couldn’t be done. Then half the blocks vanished between the two factories. Triumph countered by presenting the ACU with fully refurbishe­d machines from the previous year’s ISDT at the secret test day when BSA had claimed there wasn’t time to rebuild its bikes. The situation was becoming farcical and a threat by the ACU to hand the whole issue of team bikes to Greeves seemed to make each party grudgingly see sense. While neither side seemed happy, the project did move forward with BSA producing three hybrid Victor-framed machines with Triumph engines – they’d promised nine – and Triumph supplied the rest of the machines from the previous year’s team bikes.

On the face of it slotting a unit twin engine into a Victor frame isn’t difficult but there are issues of chain length to sort out, as depending on whether the dampers were compressed or extended, the chain was either way too slack or bowstring tight. With time being tight these issues were resolved and the three TRIBSAS that were built performed well and the one in our pictures here was ridden by Arthur Lampkin. It is surprising­ly non-trick really, being the off-the-shelf Victor scrambles frame fitted with a Triumph swinging arm and its qd rear wheel.

Up at the front end are Victor forks and a front wheel with the single sided brake that has the adjustable fulcrum slot so the brake shoes can be centralise­d. A Gold Star pattern alloy fuel tank, alloy front mudguard and stainless steel rear guard – for strength – and scrambles-style seat complete the ensemble for the chassis.

Engine wise, as well as alloy cylinder blocks, the rest of the internals were to Triumph’s Daytona specificat­ion, providing performanc­e and power aplenty. In order that the generator could be checked without pulling off the whole primary case there was a window cut in it and a cover screwed on. A massive breather pipe was fitted to the primary case and vented to the rear of the bike it allows pressure to escape and not force oil out of the engine. In recognitio­n of the possibilit­y of a rider having to navigate past fallen competitor­s or through some serious nadgery terrain, the bottom gear was lowered to give the clutch an easier time. As per BSA’S desire, the exhaust system was high level on the left hand side to prevent it

 ??  ??
 ?? By the mid- Sixties air filters had become much better than before. ?? Triumph’s unit twin isn’t as light as BSA’S singles, though alloy barrels do help lower the weight. The faster maintenanc­e tasks can be completed the better in ISDT competitio­ns, things such as Tommy bars mean no time spent fishing for spanners. A...
By the mid- Sixties air filters had become much better than before. Triumph’s unit twin isn’t as light as BSA’S singles, though alloy barrels do help lower the weight. The faster maintenanc­e tasks can be completed the better in ISDT competitio­ns, things such as Tommy bars mean no time spent fishing for spanners. A...
 ??  ?? A multitude of oil lines and also a chain oiler to drip lubricant onto the rear chain. There are plenty of fixing points for a decent bash plate.
A multitude of oil lines and also a chain oiler to drip lubricant onto the rear chain. There are plenty of fixing points for a decent bash plate.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom