Alba 10 Inch Tablet A full-size tablet att a cut price

You wait ages for a cheap tablet, and then two come along at once. In Issue 479, we reviewedwed the EE Jay (£120 from www. w. snipca.com/20971), which looks a bit like an ipad minii 2 but costs just over half as much. It was all right at firstrst glance, but with a lacklustree screen, sluggish response, the dated 5.1 version of Android and substandard cameras, it didn’t impress us much. Now, here’s a model that matchesatches the bigger and pricier ipad Air for size, but costs even less than the EE Jay.

Alba has been producing affordable audio-visual products since the 1920s, and now sells exclusively through Argos. The tablet has a soft-touch plastic case that creaks alarmingly if you twist it, so it might not be the sturdiest choice for kids, even if you wrap it in one of the two garish and ill-fitting silicone covers supplied. That said, it’s not the worst built tablet we’ve seen and it looks the part, with buttons and ports positioned along one edge (see image below). However, it’s a bit thicker and heavier than most tablets.

The 1.3GHZ Mediatek processor is faster than the one in the EE Jay, and was nearly on a par with the Amazon Fire HD 10 in our tests. 3D gaming is beyond it, but 2D games like Angry Birds were possible. Web browsing was a jerky experience and could become annoying. A microsd slot lets you add to the 16GB of built-in storage (cards cost around £10), but again the software installed is Android 5.1 Lollipop, which doesn’t let you use the extra space space for storing apps like Android 6.0 Marshmallow does.

The widescreen display has good contrast and is visible from wide angles, but its coarse 1200x800-pixel resolution isn’t ideal for reading text. That wasn’t so noticeable when watching video, but we found poor colour reproduction and limited brightness a problem – the tinny built-in speakers didn’t help either. There’s a camera on the back, but the less said about its picture quality the better.

An 8in version of the tablet is also available (£70 from www.snipca. com/21041 – reduced to £57 at the time of writing) with the same resolution, which will look sharper at that size. It’s otherwise similar, and although we haven’t tested it, it could be a better deal if you don’t need a big screen. The catch is that battery life falls to a quoted five hours. The 10in model lasted us 11 hours 30 minutes of video playback, which is impressive.

It’s cheap and looks fine, but browsing is slow and the screen isn’t bright enough

VERDICT: Last year, this would have been a great – albeit compromised – budget phone. But in today’s market it’s not quite good enough

★★★☆☆

ALTERNATIVE: Motorola Moto G4 £160 Better in every respect – notably screen, camera and battery – this is well worth the £25 extra (for unlocked version)