Country Life

The healing power of our floral pharmacy

Numerous familiar wayside and garden flowers have served wise women, clerics and physicians down the ages. Mark Griffiths investigat­es the true story of healing with herbs and discovers how Britain’s history of folk medicine reaches back into the mists of

-

OUR flora used to be our pharmacy. From all-heal to woundwort, the names of numerous native plants testify to the medical employment we once found for them. Not counting algae (although we’ve resorted to those for health, too), about 2,590 plant species are native to Britain or as good as, having become naturalise­d here by the end of the Middle Ages. At least 600 have been used in healing and not just in folk and quack cures, but also in convention­al medicine, where plants remained the predominan­t ingredient­s of remedies into the 19th century. The proportion is remarkable, and so is their story.

It was well under way by the Bronze Age. At first, the discovery process was probably one of trial and error, foraging that was fortunate or not. By such experiment­s, it seems, various native and anciently introduced species were added to our budding pharmacopo­eia. Soundly empirical, albeit no more sophistica­ted than suck it and see, this approach would continue throughout our herbal history. It would yield an impressive number of plants whose therapeuti­c value is now considered to be proven or plausible.

But magic and mystery were also factors. Consider mistletoe, the sacred plant of our ancient gods. It was administer­ed as a relaxant and as an antidote for poisoning— in which respects, science now suggests, it may well have yielded some benefit. Was this usefulness a chance find made as result of partaking of the plant during druidical rites? Or did it come first, by trial and error, and, together with this species’ unearthly appearance, form the basis for declaring mistletoe divine?

The same question—how did it start: with a practical discovery or in a mystical belief? —arises with St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum). From Classical times onwards, it was recommende­d for various bodily ailments. Parallel to these uses ran the notion that it would drive away evil spirits if ingested or displayed: Fuga Daemonium, ‘flee, demon!’, was one of its medieval names.

This species is covered in minute pellucid glands that resemble holes, hence perforatum.

These, it was said, were pinpricks made by the Devil, who was enraged at being put to flight by the magical herb. In the Renaissanc­e, physicians diagnosed this demon as melancholi­a and the torments of an unquiet mind. They weren’t wrong, it seems. Today, after studies and trials, St John’s wort is increasing­ly accepted as an effective treatment for mild depression and anxiety disorders.

Those diabolical puncture marks bring us to one of early herbal medicine’s most important, if wrongheade­d, ideas, the Doctrine of Signatures. This held that the healing properties of plants were divinely endowed for our benefit and that the gods or God had indicated which species to use for what problem by some aspect of its anatomy or habitat.

Here are a few British examples. The tubers of various native orchids resemble the male human genitalia and so men consumed them in the belief that they would enhance libido, potency and fertility. As its tubular flowers brought the female reproducti­ve system to mind, birthwort (Aristo

lochia clematitis) was judged able to induce labour or procure abortions.

Liverworts (Hepatica and Marchantia), spleenwort (Asplenium) and lungwort (Pulmonaria) were considered effective against diseases of those organs because their foliage was thought to look like them. Eyebright

(Euphrasia) was reckoned to be of ophthalmic benefit due to a perceived similarity between its streaked and blotched flowers and bloodshot and yellowed eyes. By now, I hardly need say that pilewort

(Ranunculus ficaria) was used to salve haemorrhoi­ds—and some hellish cases at that, if its tubers, which suggested this treatment, are any indication.

Of course, these and most other such signposted herbs didn’t work as advertised. The Doctrine of Signatures was merely superstiti­on systematis­ed and lacked any real predictive value. But it was not confined to the superstiti­ous and uneducated—it was invoked by the founding figures of western medicine in Antiquity and espoused by some of their most eminent successors, English doctors included, right up until the 18th century.

Some species, whose usefulness was said to have been determined by the doctrine,

‘About 600 of our 2,590 native species have been used in healing’

Our medicine was a complex hybrid of beliefs’

were indeed therapeuti­c. In Britain, as elsewhere, they are few. On account of its creeping fleshy red stems, purslane (Portulaca oleracea) was taken to counteract intestinal worms. The yellow flowers and sap of greater celandine (Chelidoniu­m

majus) suggested its use in treating jaundice. Because they flourished in watery habitats, willow (Salix alba) and meadowswee­t (Filipendul­a ulmaria) were made key ingredient­s of remedies for the fevers, chills and joint troubles that afflicted people who lived near rivers and in wetlands.

Successes such as these may have inspired the Doctrine of Signatures. For sure, they’d have been seen as proof of it (‘the signs said willow would help my aching bones and it does’). Equally, the usefulness of these plants may have been hit upon by trial and error and the doctrinal explanatio­n applied to them much later, be it to credit the Creator or to assert what, in those days, was an authoritat­ive reason for trusting them to work, or simply as a form of mnemonic (‘ah yes—yellow sap, that one’s good for jaundice’).

By the 9th century, our medicine was a complex hybrid of beliefs that had arrived with successive waves of settlers and visitors, chief among them the Celtic Britons, Romans, Saxons and Danes. To it, King Alfred brought a characteri­stically serious and unifying approach. He sponsored the study of Classical authors and the collecting and assessing of local lore. He also sent to the Continent and the Holy Land for informatio­n and materials.

The oldest surviving English medical texts can be traced to this period, compilatio­ns of laecedomas (leechdoms), meaning ‘remedies’, from laece, physician, and dom, opinion or ruling. They are thick with plants, a striking proportion of them native.

Consider a recipe for a salve for the head from the great 10th-century manuscript that scholars call Bald’s Leechbook, after its original owner, one Bald. It begins by asking for myrrh, aloes and frankincen­se— exotic materials and exorbitant, if obtainable—but then it gives a homegrown alternativ­e composed of nigon wyrta englisce, ‘nine English plants’, and lists them.

Some of their names provide an insight into the Anglo-saxon herbal mentality. They

are to do with finding the right thing. For example, haran sprecel (viper’s bugloss,

Echium vulgare) means ‘white-hairy speckle’, referring to the pale bristles with dark spotlike bases that cover this species’ stems, so distinguis­hing it from other blue-flowered members of the borage family. Similarly,

ruwe wegbraede (Plantago media) means ‘rough way-broad’, this plant being hirsute, broad-leaved and wayside-dwelling.

Between Alfred’s reign and the late Middle Ages, priests and nuns became the chief custodians of learned medicine. They continued to translate texts and compile remedies. They produced useful synonyma, parallel lists of plant names, Latin and English. They gardened and, with the herbs that they grew, made treating the needy beyond their walls a major part of their ministry—a service they’d perform until the Reformatio­n.

But they were not the only salvation for the sick and poor. There were also primitive, folk or unorthodox healers, preservers of the old ways, superstiti­ons and cures. They were mostly rural and female, often lowly and illiterate, but revered, powerful within their communitie­s.

Their medicine, too, was plant-based, only its ingredient­s tended to be gathered wild rather than grown. ‘Wise women’, as these cottage shamanesse­s were known, would provide an alternativ­e to mainstream medicine for centuries, and, at times, send it in important new directions by furnishing convention­al practition­ers with clues.

The last major production of our monastic herbal tradition is the manuscript compiled between 1481 and 1517 by Thomas Betson, deacon, healer and librarian at Syon Abbey in Middlesex. It contains a long list of medicinal plants, many of them native, followed by a collection of recipes for cures.

In 1518, the year after Betson’s death, things began to change. Henry VIII granted a charter to a new institutio­n, the College of Physicians (later and still, the Royal College), so creating a profession­al elite— learned exponents of medicine who mostly studied and operated in the secular world. The College had powers.

It examined would-be doctors and licensed them to practice. It prosecuted and punished unlicensed practition­ers, wise women among them. It had dominion over physic, which, in this context, meant internal medicine. Strictly, no surgeon could employ physic unless supervised by a physician.

It also kept watch on the apothecari­es who supplied medicines and their ingredient­s. One of the oldest botanical epithets,

officinali­s, means ‘as sold in apothecari­es’

shops’. It reminds us that various familiar ornamental and culinary plants were originally medicinal: Asparagus officinali­s, Calendula officinali­s, Rosa gallica Officinali­s, Salvia officinali­s.

The apothecary’s was an ancient trade. As a result of being policed by the College, it grew in importance. Officinal became a byword for official: herbs and preparatio­ns were meant to be bought only from suppliers who passed muster.

However, licensed physicians were few and seldom came cheap. Apothecari­es, likewise, knew how to charge. When sick, the poor often continued to look to religious houses, which the College left largely alone. This recourse ended in the late 1530s with the dissolutio­n of the monasterie­s. Henry VIII’S marital difficulti­es had precipitat­ed a national healthcare crisis. It would not be addressed until after his death, when the Lord Protector Edward Seymour took an interest in the problem.

In the late 1540s, he employed two gifted men at his residence—aptly enough, the erstwhile Syon Abbey—the cleric, physician and botanist William Turner and a rising bureaucrat, William Cecil.

Commanded by Seymour and supported by Cecil, Turner produced A New Herball, which was published after his master’s downfall in three volumes (1551, 1562 and 1568). In it, Turner took pains to identify native plants of therapeuti­c value and to clarify and promote their naming in English. Moreover, the body of the text was in English, how-to-do-it material of a kind that would normally be in Latin and the monopoly of the medical elite.

Cecil—lord Burghley as he became— pursued the project of making medicine accessible in his capacity as Elizabeth I’s chief minister. Although the College of Physicians remained mighty, it sometimes fell foul of the Queen in its actions against unlicensed practition­ers, especially if they were women. The chatelaine­s of country estates were encouraged to read works of medical botany and to tend to their staff, tenants and the local poor.

On the battlefiel­d, at sea and among London’s deprived, talented surgeons were emboldened to practise physic unsupervis­ed. And one of them knew more about its main ingredient­s than anyone else in England: Burghley’s servant, John Gerard. He had travelled widely in search of medicinal plants and created the country’s greatest collection of them in his garden in Holborn. Published in early 1598 (although dated 1597), his Herball was dedicated to his master, who had cultivated Gerard even more assiduousl­y than he had Turner decades earlier.

The book contained many non-native species. Its botanical and medical foundation­s reflected recent Continenta­l learning and yet its Englishnes­s rang out, page after page. If he judged them effective, Gerard incorporat­ed remedies that he’d gathered from wise women and other unorthodox practition­ers on excursions about the country. He included local English names for plants, many of them coined by women.

He pitched The Herball in such a way that the Queen’s Physician could hail its unmatched expertise, while educated gentlewome­n could use it as a guide in their charitable ministrati­ons. To increase its usefulness, where possible, he recommende­d indigenous plants in preference to exotics and imported products.

In this, Gerard was reflecting the spirit of his times. In 1580, another of Burghley’s protégés, Timothy Bright, physician and inventor of modern shorthand, had published A Treatise: wherein is declared the sufficienc­ie of English Medicines. The

‘The last two decades of Elizabeth’s reign saw an explosion of native herbalism

James I put an end to this liberality. Distinguis­hed and broad-minded doctors, who had served Elizabeth and been sympatheti­c to Burghley and Gerard, found little favour with the new King. Encouraged by him, the College of Physicians took a hard line on unlicensed healers, wise women included—james, remember, had form as a scourge of witchcraft.

In 1605, he decreed that the writing of medico-botanical works in England would henceforth be the prerogativ­e of Matthias de l’obel, an Anglophobi­c non-anglophone. In 1618, the Physicians published Pharmacopo­eia Londinensi­s, a directory of substances and formulae, prefaced by a royal proclamati­on that prohibited practition­ers from providing or prescribin­g anything that was not contained in its pages.

The Pharmacopo­eia listed non-native plant materials as necessitie­s, which gave a boost to London’s apothecari­es. Not that they needed one: the previous year, the King had granted them their own society by charter and, with it, power to enforce

their monopoly. This fierce regulation faltered during the Civil War. Now, Nicholas Culpeper, England’s most defiant medical outsider, was able to produce a series of radical works that placed the art of healing back in the hands of the common people and promoted plants that were readily grown or found in the wild.

The most important went on sale in 1652 at 3d a copy: The English Physitian: or an Astrologo-physical Discourse of the

Vulgar Herbs of This Nation. It promised ‘a Compleat Method of Physick, whereby a man may preserve his Body in Health; or cure himself, being sick, for three pence charge, with such things only as grow in England, they being most fit for English Bodies’. Reissued as The Complete Herbal, the book proved irrepressi­bly popular.

Over the next hundred years, exploratio­n, trade and colonialis­m provided physicians and apothecari­es with ever more foreign plant medicines to prescribe and sell. Meanwhile, many ordinary folk continued to use the homespun and homegrown alter-

 ??  ?? Nicholas Culpeper championed the rights of ordinary folk to be treated with medicines made from British plants
Nicholas Culpeper championed the rights of ordinary folk to be treated with medicines made from British plants
 ??  ?? The yellow sap and flowers of greater celandine (Chelidoniu­m majus) were seen as God-given signs that it would remedy jaundice
The yellow sap and flowers of greater celandine (Chelidoniu­m majus) were seen as God-given signs that it would remedy jaundice
 ??  ?? Used for centuries to relieve pain and fever, white willow (Salix alba) furnished modern pharmaceut­icals with the active ingredient of aspirin
Used for centuries to relieve pain and fever, white willow (Salix alba) furnished modern pharmaceut­icals with the active ingredient of aspirin
 ??  ?? Rosa gallica Officinali­s, the apothecary’s rose
Rosa gallica Officinali­s, the apothecary’s rose
 ??  ?? Lungwort (Pulmonaria): its leaves’ shape and spotting were thought to indicate its usefulness against chest diseases
Lungwort (Pulmonaria): its leaves’ shape and spotting were thought to indicate its usefulness against chest diseases
 ??  ?? With flowers that resemble the female reproducti­ve organs, birthwort (Aristoloch­ia clematitis) was used in inducing labour
With flowers that resemble the female reproducti­ve organs, birthwort (Aristoloch­ia clematitis) was used in inducing labour
 ??  ?? St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum), once supposed to drive away demons, mania and melancholy, now administer­ed as an anti-depressant
St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum), once supposed to drive away demons, mania and melancholy, now administer­ed as an anti-depressant
 ??  ?? The sacred plant of the Ancient Britons, mistletoe (Viscum album) was used by them as a poison antidote and nerve relaxant
The sacred plant of the Ancient Britons, mistletoe (Viscum album) was used by them as a poison antidote and nerve relaxant
 ??  ?? Marigold (Calendula officinali­s), wrote John Gerard, ‘is thought to strengthen & comfort the hart, & to withstand poison, as also to be good against pestilent agues’
Marigold (Calendula officinali­s), wrote John Gerard, ‘is thought to strengthen & comfort the hart, & to withstand poison, as also to be good against pestilent agues’
 ??  ?? The genuine efficacy of foxglove (Digitalis purpurea) in treating heart conditions was discovered as a result of its use in a country remedy
The genuine efficacy of foxglove (Digitalis purpurea) in treating heart conditions was discovered as a result of its use in a country remedy

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom