Country Life

Fortresses in the frame

Evocative and symbolic, the imagery of castles proves an excellent subject for an exhibition, says Tim Richardson

-

For the British, a castle is at once romantical­ly remote and intimately familiar. And the paradoxes multiply. Frequently ruinous, a castle no longer performs its ancient function, but retains a powerful aura. Unlike a cathedral, a castle is not woven into the warp and weft of a city: it is exceptiona­l, standing apart, literally and metaphoric­ally, often in a highly picturesqu­e location (part of the appeal for artists). A castle is so large that it cannot be missed, yet it projects an enigmatic quality. A place of security, a castle is also a place that, historical­ly, most citizens would rather have avoided.

However, it is also a good guess that most people, what- ever their social background, will have been taken to see at least one castle in childhood, clambering the battlement­s and imagining knights in armour or damsels in distress. A ruined castle is arguably more access- ible to visitors (in every way) than a furnished country house. The layout seems familiar and the very emptiness creates a space for imaginativ­e intimacy.

These contradict­ions make the castle a rich topic for an exhibition and Southampto­n City Art Gallery, and its sponsor, the Punter Southall Group, should be congratula­ted for taking the initiative with ‘Capture the Castle’.

Like its subject, the exhibition also has something of a split personalit­y. A well-produced catalogue includes essays on the history of castles, their symbolism, their place in the developing Picturesqu­e aesthetic and on specialist topics, such as etchings and the Gothic revival.

To read these, and to absorb the number of guidebook-style watercolou­r reconstruc­tions of ancient castles (mostly by Alan Sorrell) in the exhibition, one would assume that a historical and narrative approach has

‘A castle is at once romantical­ly remote and intimately familiar’

been taken. But that is just part of the story, as at least a quarter of the exhibition is taken up by interpreta­tions of the castle theme by modern and contempora­ry artists, including paintings (of varying quality and interest) that are conceptual­ist or abstract in tone.

These are not mentioned at all in the introducto­ry captions to each room of the exhibition and they seem to sit rather awkwardly with the rest. It is as if some guerilla co-curator has crept in to disturb the antiquaria­n peace.

Once the visitor has accepted this anomaly, the exhibition can be approached in a similarly freewheeli­ng spirit. One would expect to find J. M. W. Turner and Thomas Girtin here— the latter’s Macbeth-inflected watercolou­r of Bamburgh Castle is a highlight—but there are numerous other absorbing studies of castles by artists such as Leonard Squirrell, who manages to imbue the castle in

Morning at Durham (1935) with an almost domestic air, and Joseph Webb, who takes the opposite approach with a hard-edged etching of Chepstow Castle.

Some artists play on the idea of the exceptiona­lism and isolation of castles; others present them as absorbed into the landscape over the centuries. Philip Wilson Steer takes the latter approach with his interpreta­tion of Chepstow, a 1905 oil realised in a palette of ochres, browns and the darkest of greens. The work has its compositio­nal shortcomin­gs, but there is an intriguing­ly fluid quality to the scene as river, cliff, castle and sky seem to meld with each other.

Thomas Rowlandson captures the mundane domesticit­y of garrison life in a pair of watercolou­rs of Hurst Castle, where the cannon seem almost comically enormous next to the lounging soldiers and their womenfolk.

Of the contempora­ry art, I particular­ly enjoyed Norman Ackroyd’s dark and moody etchings—the Mcneils’ Kisimul Castle at Barra in the Outer Hebrides seems to be disintegra­ting into the sky—and Ffiona Lewis’s scratched oil painting of her local castle, Framlingha­m in Suffolk.

The most rewarding passage is a trio of contrastin­g paintings hung together in the penultimat­e room. Two date from 1971: John Piper’s delicate screenprin­t of Caernarvon in a palette of mauves and blue-greys and David Gentleman’s schematic, Pop Art-inflected ‘plan view’ of Caerphilly, with bulbous turrets. The third is a 1930 London Transport poster of Windsor by Walter Spradbery, in which the flanelled punters, rippling Thames and benign castle, orange in the evening light, create an inviting and utterly complacent scene.

A castle is clearly what the artist makes of it, but this exhibition shows that the result is always likely to be powerfully engaging.

‘Capture the Castle: British Artists and the Castle from Turner to Le Brun’ is at Southampto­n City Art Gallery, Commercial Road, Southampto­n, Hampshire, until September 2 (www.southampto­n cityartgal­lery.com; 023–8083 3007)

Next week: ‘Ravilious & Co’ at Towner Art Gallery, Eastbourne

 ??  ?? Untoward by Royal Academy president Christophe­r Le Brun: ‘The castle is an enduring symbol as secure and familiar as any’, he writes
Untoward by Royal Academy president Christophe­r Le Brun: ‘The castle is an enduring symbol as secure and familiar as any’, he writes
 ??  ?? Norman Ackroyd’s etching of Kisimul, Barra, Mcneil’s Castle (2016)
Norman Ackroyd’s etching of Kisimul, Barra, Mcneil’s Castle (2016)
 ??  ?? Caerphilly Castle (1971), a screenprin­t by David Gentleman
Caerphilly Castle (1971), a screenprin­t by David Gentleman
 ??  ?? The Eagle Tower, Caernarfon by Paul Sandby. Hailed as the ‘father of English Watercolou­r’, Sandby began sketching tours of Wales after an acclaimed series of drawings of Windsor
The Eagle Tower, Caernarfon by Paul Sandby. Hailed as the ‘father of English Watercolou­r’, Sandby began sketching tours of Wales after an acclaimed series of drawings of Windsor

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom