Uber in court appeal
UBER is to appeal to the Supreme Court after losing a case over the employment rights of drivers.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal rejected the taxi firm’s argument over the status of employees.
Unions argue staff should be classified as “workers” rather than being self-employed, which would entitle them to rights such as holiday pay.
Two drivers took a case to a tribunal last year, arguing they were Uber staff and entitled to holiday pay, paid rest breaks and the minimum wage. A TEENAGER who killed a seven-year-old girl in a park has been told she could be released from detention after five years by a judge who said: “The utter tragedy and devastation of all this needs no emphasis.”
But Mr Justice Soole told the 16-year-old, who was 15 when she smothered and knifed Katie Rough, she would not be released until she was no longer deemed to be dangerous.
The judge said: “In the circumstances of your continuing silence, the critical question is whether there is any reliable estimate as to how long that danger will continue.”
He was speaking yesterday at Leeds Crown Court as he sentenced the teenager to a life sentence with a minimum term of five years.
Clutching a soft toy, the girl sat with her head bowed throughout the sentencing hearing, watching through a videolink from a room elsewhere in the building.
Katie was found with severe lacerations to her neck and chest on a field in the Woodthorpe area of York on January 9 and did not respond to frantic attempts to revive her. But the judge heard that she actually died from being smothered by her teenage Katie Rough was smothered to death attacker. At an earlier hearing the court was told that the teenager was found standing in a cul-de-sac covered in blood and carrying a blood-stained Stanley knife as she rang 999 to tell police what she had done.
The judge was told that the girl began suffering from mental health problems more than a year before the killing.
Prosecutors said she had reported delusional thoughts as well as depression, selfharm and suicidal thoughts. They said the girl had talked of being convinced that people “weren’t human and were robots”.
Nicholas Johnson QC, defending, told the last hearing it may be that his client was “driven by the irrational belief (Katie) may not have been human and needed proof of this”.
The barrister said his client had posted a picture on social media two days before the killing with a concerning message.
He said: “She was clearly crying out for help and support.”
Yesterday the packed court heard that experts still cannot agree on what is the girl’s mental disorder, partly because she had failed to engage with doctors.
Psychiatrists have explored whether she was suffering from a depressive disorder and there has also been a concern she was suffering from an emerging schizo-type personality disorder.
The girl denied murder but pleaded guilty to manslaughter by diminished responsibility at the hearing in July.
The judge said it was a “truly exceptional case” and added: “The utter tragedy and devastation of all this needs no emphasis.”
Katie’s father Paul wiped his eyes as he left court with her mother, Alison, and many other members of their family who watched proceedings from the jury box.