Coventry Telegraph

Labour MP charged

- Tini and Hugh Owens

LABOUR MP Fiona Onasanya has appeared in court charged with perverting the course of justice.

The Peterborou­gh MP, left, was charged over allegedly lying about who was behind the wheel of a speeding vehicle and first appeared in court on July 12. She is due in court again on August 13. LAWYERS say ministers must reform England’s “archaic” divorce law after five Supreme Court justices ruled that a 68-year-old woman had to stay in a “loveless” marriage she wants to end.

An associatio­n of specialist family lawyers said no-one should have to remain “trapped in a marriage” in the 21st Century.

Resolution said there was a “divorce crisis” in England and Wales and called on the Government to take urgent action.

Tini Owens had told the Supreme Court that her 40-year marriage to Hugh Owens, 80, was “loveless” and “broken down” and she said she wanted a divorce.

She said he had behaved unreasonab­ly and she should not reasonably be expected to stay married.

Mr Owens had refused to agree to a divorce, justices heard, and denied Mrs Owens’ allegation­s about his behaviour.

He said if their marriage had irretrieva­bly broken down it was because she had an affair, or, because she was “bored”.

Two years ago a family court judge rejected Mrs Owens’ allegation­s and refused to grant her a divorce.

Judge Robin Tolson described her complaints about Mr Owens as “flimsy and exaggerate­d”.

Last year three appeal judges ruled against Mrs Owens’ challenge to that decision after a Court of Appeal hearing in London.

Supreme Court justices have now also ruled against her.

They had analysed rival legal arguments at a Supreme Court hearing in London in May and delivered a ruling yesterday.

One, Lord Wilson, said justices had ruled against Mrs Owens “with reluctance”.

He said the “question for Parliament” was whether the law governing “entitlemen­t to divorce” remained “satisfacto­ry”.

Lord Wilson indicated that the law would allow Mrs Owens to divorce in 2020, when the couple had been separated for five years.

Mr and Mrs Owens had married in 1978 and lived in Broadway, Worcesters­hire, judges had heard.

Mrs Owens petitioned for divorce in 2015 after moving out. Resolution said the case was “troubling”. “Whilst the Supreme Court has, reluctantl­y, applied the law correctly, the fact that they have done so confirms there is now a divorce crisis in England and Wales, and the Government needs to take urgent action to address it,” said Nigel Shepherd, a former Resolution chairman.

“In this day and age, it is outrageous that Mrs Owens – or anybody – is forced to remain trapped in a marriage, despite every judge involved in the case acknowledg­ing it has come to an end in all but name.

“Today’s judgment underlines just how vital it is that Government now urgently reforms the divorce law.”

He added: “It should not be for any husband or wife to ‘prove’ blame as the law requires many to do – this is archaic, creates needless conflict, and has to change.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom