Coventry Telegraph

PARKING FINES OVERTURNED AS SIGNS ‘UNCLEAR’

TRIBUNAL RIPS UP ANOTHER EIGHT TICKETS DESPITE PREVIOUS WARNINGS

- By TOM DAVIS Local Democracy Reporter

CITY chiefs should fix ‘inadequate’ parking signs or face a court challenge over fines, campaigner­s have said, as an independen­t adjudicato­r again criticised Coventry council’s parking scheme.

Adjudicato­r of the Traffic Penalty Tribunal (TPT) said it is “disappoint­ed” to still be overturnin­g council fines within the city centre Restricted Parking Zone (RPZ).

That is despite it ruling in May 2018 that the council’s parking signage was “inadequate” and not understood by motorists, branding the council “delusional reminiscen­t of King Canute” over its stance.

Since May’s ruling, eight council fines have been overturned by the TPT on appeal on roads already highlighte­d for criticism by chief tribunal adjudicato­r Caroline Sheppard.

The scheme was implemente­d in 2012 and following the damning ruling Coventry city council insisted it was enforceabl­e.

But it is still causing problems for motorists 18 months on, with the authority falling silent on the latest criticism when asked for comment by the Local Democracy Reporting Service. It is feared many more than the eight who have had their fines overturned could be falling foul of the parking scheme.

Shadow cabinet member for city services Cllr Tim Mayer says many could be paying fines wrongly issued and not appealing them.

A Freedom of Informatio­n request by the LDRS found total penalty charge notices (PCNs) on the roads increased in the year after May’s ruling – up from 3,305 in 2017/18 to 3,497 in the last financial year – although this is for a variety of parking and bus lane offences.

Cllr Mayer has been fighting for improvemen­ts since 2016, but further questionin­g this week has prompted the council into installing five new signs on one of the problem roads, Gosford Street, he has been told.

But he said: “I personally raised this with Cllr Pat Hetherton [cabinet member for city services] on July 30 this year and was assured signage would be erected.

“It was therefore very disappoint­ing that I have had to chase again at the end of October before signage has started to go up.

“This is just continued times of delusion and confusion where Coventry City Council again seems to be ignoring the experts at the Traffic

Penalty Tribunal. Eight people have had their fine overturned by the adjudicato­rs since last year but it could be thousands more who should have as most people do not appeal it.”

From June 8, 2018 to October 2, 2019, six parking fines have been appealed to the TPT at Cope Street, one at Warwick Lane, and one at Whitefriar­s Street.

In recent appeals overturned, adjudicato­r Sarah Tozzi said she was “not satisfied that adequate informatio­n was provided” about restrictio­ns.

Repeater signs alerting motorists to the RPZ are “unclear”, while entry signs are also “unclear”, she has said.

Removal of double yellow road markings also “cause confusion” and “gives the impression that the restrictio­n has been removed”, she said.

Ms Tozzi also said the size of Coventry’s RPZ was too large and ignored guidance stating it is intended for “small, defined areas of single streets”.

A TPT spokesman added: “The adjudicato­rs are disappoint­ed to see that PCNs are still being issued for alleged contravent­ions at the locations within the Coventry RPZ covered by Chief Adjudicato­r Caroline Sheppard OBE’s decision of 8 May 2018.”

With problems still being highlighte­d with the city’s parking signage, campaigner Richard Heneghan has challenged the authority to appeal to the High Court if it disagrees with rulings made.

He said: “People do not bother appealing. The council turn everybody down at first instance and that reduces the amount of people that go to the TPT exponentia­lly.

“To drag people through an onerous process and the council to not fix anything - it is really unfair.

“The council has had so many opportunit­ies to fix this and it does still not.

“If the council does not agree with what the TPT rules, as with other councils have done, they have the remit to challenge the ruling.

“What Coventry should have done is allow this to go to the High Court to make sure they are getting it right for the people of Coventry.”

Cllr Pat Hetherton, the cabinet member responsibl­e for city services, said that while it was an issue that deserved a response, she would be unable to comment as it falls under the cabinet role of deputy council leader Cllr Abdul Khan under his portfolio of policing and enforcemen­t.

Cllr Khan was in China, while the city council did not respond to repeated requests for a comment.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Whitefriar­s Street in Coventry is one of the roads highlighte­d in the RPZ judgement
Whitefriar­s Street in Coventry is one of the roads highlighte­d in the RPZ judgement

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom