24 new flats get go-ahead in Coventry

PLANS for 24 new flats in Coventry have been approved by council chiefs. Developer Persimmon Homes originally wanted to build 44 flats on the Paragon Park site, but these were rejected by chiefs in May.

The main reasons for refusal were the lack of parking spaces and private outdoor areas for residents. There were also fears of an “over-intensive use of the site,” the decision notice read.

But Persimmon submitted amended plans which were discussed at a planning committee and given the go ahead.

Persimmon Homes technical director Nick Wilkins said: “We are very pleased with the council’s decision to approve the final phase of development at Paragon Park which will bring further much-needed homes to the Foleshill area of the city.

“The site will offer a range of accommodation including one and two bed apartments, 25% of which will be managed by one of our local housing association providers.

“This new development will provide a distinct architectural gateway from Stoney Stanton Road into Paragon Park and positively contribute to the local identity and character in this part of the city.

“The site will provide a number of community benefits secured through the S106 legal agreement which include contributions to education, highways (in the form of bus travel vouchers, cycle hire and cycle docking stations) and improvements to local open spaces.”

Persimmon Homes adapted plans, slashing the number of flats to 24, so there is no longer a shortfall in parking spaces, as there will be two spaces per each two-bedroom flat. Flats have also been given balconies or, if they’re on the ground floor, small areas boxed in by hedges.

The problem of separation distances has also been fixed, developers say, by putting bathrooms on the side that looks onto a neighbouring block of flats. Bathrooms aren’t classed as “habitable rooms” - and therefore don’t have to be 20 metres away.

However, public consultation shows there are still concerns over potential traffic and congestion increases, and a reduction in air quality, as well as a lack of car parking.

People were also worried the buildings would be out of character with the area and would contribute to a loss of light in existing homes. There was also the suggestion that nearby services, such as the doctor’s surgery, would be negatively impacted.