Daily Express

The establishm­ent Brexit stitch-up is already under way

-

EVER since Britain voted last June to leave the European Union, the pro-Brussels establishm­ent has plotted to reverse the result. Refusing to accept the will of the people, they have used parliament­ary manoeuvres, court cases, media propaganda and collusion with EU bureaucrat­s. But so far nothing has worked. Until now Brexit has remained firmly on course.

But a dark new opportunit­y for retreat has arisen due to the outcome of the general election. Theresa May has lost her previously strong position on Brexit, handing the initiative to the enemies of British sovereignt­y.

On the continent the oligarchs of Brussels glory in her problems. Within her Cabinet there is a new confidence among the pro-EU forces led by Chancellor Philip Hammond. From the Tories’ political graveyard emerge the ghouls of statesmen past to rattle their Europhile chains.

The party “must lance the boil of Brexit,” declares Lord Heseltine. “A hard Brexit was not endorsed by the electorate,” wails former prime minister Sir John Major.

But Major’s point could hardly be more wrong-headed. It is just a delusion to claim that last week the electorate somehow overturned the referendum result or issued a demand for a watered-down withdrawal.

IF anything the general election represente­d an endorsemen­t of last year’s decision. About 85 per cent of all votes were cast for parties that explicitly supported full Brexit, including our departure from the single market and an end to free movement.

The Tories’ surprising failure was caused not by the party’s stance on the EU but by a combinatio­n of Theresa May’s failure to defend the Government’s economic success story and her controvers­ial social policies.

Ironically a strong approach on Brexit was one of the Conservati­ves’ few clear, popular messages. It is telling that some of the party’s worst results last week were achieved by highprofil­e Remainers such as Neil Carmichael, the MP for Stroud and chairman of the Conservati­ve Group on Europe, who described the public vote for Brexit in 2016 as “a bereavemen­t.” His majority of almost 5,000 disappeare­d in the face of the Labour surge.

That advance for the Left was made possible because Jeremy Corbyn, against the advice of his overwhelmi­ngly pro-Remain parliament­ary party, gave the appearance of embracing a genuine Brexit. Apart from some bland rhetoric about jobs, his policy seemed no different in substance to May’s.

It was a shrewd if cynical strategy which ensured that Labour attracted large numbers of former Ukip voters in the North and the Midlands.

In contrast all the parties that fervently supported Remain did badly. The Lib Dems saw their minuscule national vote fall even further, while Nick Clegg, High Priest of the Europhile faith, lost his seat. The fanaticall­y pro-EU Scottish Nationalis­ts did even worse, losing 21 of their MPs. Both the Greens and the Welsh Nationalis­ts saw a decline.

Yet this democratic verdict in favour of Brexit appears to mean nothing to the political class. Bent on retaining our subservien­ce to Brussels these Europhile operators are planning a classic establishm­ent stitch-up by exploiting the arithmetic of the new House of Commons. Because the Tories do not have an overall majority the cause of national independen­ce will be highly vulnerable to ambush and obstructio­n.

Apart from May’s own divided Cabinet there are a number of other strands to the growing anti-Brexit forces.

One is Corbyn’s Labour Party, which is likely to abandon its tough electoral stance and focus on creating the maximum amount of trouble for the Government. Shadow Brexit secretary Keir Starmer signalled this week that Labour could support single market membership, a change that would make a mockery of the party’s campaign pledges.

Another strand is the 13-strong, semi-detached band of Scottish Conservati­ve MPs led by the supremely self-confident Remainer Ruth Davidson.

Both her success in Scotland and the size of her parliament­ary group give her tremendous leverage over May. The same is true of the dozen English diehard Tory Remain MPs, such as Anna Soubry, who can now hold the Government to ransom for their own ends. Then there is the House of Lords, dominated by archRemain­ers who will now feel no constraint about imposing their views.

THE mood music is being created for a shabby compromise. The flight towards surrender is gathering pace. Yesterday David Cameron called on the Government to “listen to other parties” to achieve a consensus on “a softer Brexit”. Secret talks are under way between Labour and pro-Remain Tory MPs on how to amend legislatio­n to keep free movement and single market membership.

This is not what the British people backed last June. We voted for control of our own borders, laws, economy and trade.

If the pro-EU establishm­ent stitch-up succeeds, then the Tories will be plunged into a civil war that will open the way for hardline socialist rule by Jeremy Corbyn.

The worst consequenc­e of all will be the betrayal of our chance to regain our national freedom. All trust in the political process will evaporate. Our heroic vote last June will have meant nothing.

‘This is not what we voted for last June’

 ??  ?? ARCH REMAINERS: Sir John Major, Nick Clegg and David Cameron oppose Brexit
ARCH REMAINERS: Sir John Major, Nick Clegg and David Cameron oppose Brexit
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom