Daily Express

Our waistlines are no business of the Government

-

PUBLIC health campaigner­s are experts at spreading misery and creating false panics. Their favourite activity at the moment is to pretend that our country is in the grip of a so-called “obesity epidemic”, which supposedly threatens the fabric not just of our trousers but of society itself. More than 66 per cent of the population is said to be obese or overweight. This national emergency, we are told in alarmist martial tones, can be tackled only by a “war” on calories and the “weapons” of ever more intrusive state interventi­on.

As a result of the manufactur­ed climate of anxiety, the health lobby’s armoury of action is expanding remorseles­sly. Already we have bans on “junk food” advertisin­g aimed at children as well as the introducti­on of the sugar levy, due to take effect next month.

Now the quango Public Health England, the citadel of the new puritans, has issued guidelines that ask companies to slash by a fifth the calorific content of a vast range of products, from pies to sausages. Public Health England is urging adults to get into the habit of counting calories at every meal, based on maximum limits of 400 for breakfast, 600 for lunch and 600 for dinner.

Predictabl­y the Government, instead of protecting freedom of choice, has joined in this festival of nutritiona­l disapprova­l. Yesterday it was reported that Theresa May’s officials are working on a further crackdown against the marketing of junk food, including curbs on two-for-one deal promotions.

AS THESE measures demonstrat­e, the instinct of the state bureaucrac­y is to hector and punish. Health lobbyists and their allies are using obesity as a vehicle to grab more power and influence while they dress up their arrogance in the language of compassion. The great author CS Lewis wrote that, “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than omnipotent moral busybodies.”

The term “busybodies” is a perfect descriptio­n for public health meddlers. Like the worst religious zealots they are determined to trap the population in a permanent sense of guilt and doom. It might be asked: who does more for the sum of human happiness – the cake-dodging killjoy or the laughter-inducing Hollywood actress Melissa McCarthy, whose generous figure has been a symbol of her life-enhancing comic talent?

With their Cromwellia­n mentality the public health bullies show no recognitio­n of the pleasures brought by food and drink. A central part of their propaganda is that a brainwashe­d public are the victims of nasty, capitalist businesses who peddle high-calorie foods in their cynical drive to boost profits. In this morality tale, Big Food is portrayed, like Big Tobacco, as the irresponsi­ble enemy of the people.

But such a narrative is based on myths. Contrary to the claims of the new puritans, the eating of sugar, salt, fat and calories has actually been falling for decades. Sugar consumptio­n has declined by 16 per cent per head since 1992, while there has been a 45 per cent drop in sugary drink consumptio­n since 2003. The British Heart Foundation, no ally of excess, admits: “The overall intake of calories and saturated fat has decreased since the 1970s.”

The reason for bulging waistlines, in Britain and across the world, is simple. It is due to our increasing­ly sedentary lives and greater affluence. But that should be a cause for celebratio­n, not anguish, for our societies are no longer scarred by poverty, slum housing, backbreaki­ng manual labour and malnutriti­on. We are fortunate to live in an age of abundance, from entertainm­ent technology to eating out.

Expanding girths are the consequenc­e of that greater ease. But we should be able to take responsibi­lity for our own lifestyles rather than be ruled by state diktat. The circumfere­nce of our waistlines is not the business of the Government. Ah, cry the finger-wagging interventi­onists, but what about the costs to the NHS? According to some estimates, the NHS spends £6billion a year on obesity-related treatment, while Simon Stevens, the chief executive of NHS England, has put the figure as high as £16billion.

But the fatal flaw in this argument is that it ignores the huge financial contributi­on made by heavyweigh­t consumers to British prosperity. Just as smokers and drinkers pay far more in tax revenue than they take from the NHS, so Britain’s guzzlers fuel the economy.

BRITONS annually spend £203billion on food and drink, with expenditur­e on takeaways alone amounting to almost £10billion in 2014. Food and drink is Britain’s largest single industry, employing four million people. As part of this inspiratio­nal success story there are about 450,000 restaurant­s and catering establishm­ents in Britain. Yet the merchants of misery see the enriching commercial expansion only as an excuse for bullying.

There is a profound totalitari­an impulse behind the public health lobby. It is as if they think that we have a duty to the state to be healthy and maintain a spartan diet. It is an oppressive attitude brilliantl­y satirised by George Orwell in his novel 1984 when the ruling regime required every citizen to undertake a morning ritual of “physical jerks”.

Today we should not cave in to the real-life scaremonge­rs, with all their self-interested regulation­s and edicts.

‘What of the pleasures of food and drink?’

 ??  ?? LIFE-ENHANCING: Melissa McCarthy and Susan Sarandon in the 2014 film Tammy
LIFE-ENHANCING: Melissa McCarthy and Susan Sarandon in the 2014 film Tammy
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom