Daily Express

GKN rejects Melrose ‘final offer’ of £8.1bn

- By David Shand

GKN has rejected a “final” £8.1billion hostile takeover offer by turnaround specialist Melrose Industries.

Melrose sweetened its initial £7.4billion approach and increased the proportion of the combined UK-listed manufactur­ing “powerhouse” that would be owned by GKN’s shareholde­rs from 57 per cent to 60 per cent.

But FTSE 100 engineer GKN dismissed the offer as “undervalui­ng” the business, when factoring in prospects for its “world- class” aerospace division.

GKN has also struck a £4.4billion deal to merge its automotive business with US auto parts group Dana and is committed to returning £2.5billion to shareholde­rs over three years.

Melrose chairman Christophe­r Miller said GKN’s board had rebuffed attempts to engage in talks aimed at achieving a recommende­d offer.

He accused GKN of “attempting a hasty fire-sale of businesses before they have been given a chance to reach their potential and with damaging consequenc­es for all stakeholde­rs”.

He added: “The outcome of the disposals would leave behind a GKN Aerospace business burdened by a disproport­ionate, and very substantia­l, amount of gross pension liabilitie­s, inappropri­ate for the size of the underlying business. This transactio­n poses risks for GKN pensioners and employees in both Driveline and Aerospace and would be bad for UK industrial strategy.”

GKN claimed Melrose’s revised 467p-ashare offer was, in fact, worth 445½p when taking into account a movement in the Melrose share price and excluding the value of the GKN final dividend.

GKN chairman Mike Turner said: “Melrose management lacks relevant experience and its short-term business model is inappropri­ate for GKN’s customers and its investors.”

GKN shareholde­rs have until March 29 to decide. David Cumming at Aviva Investors said: “As shareholde­rs in both Melrose and GKN we favour Melrose’s proposed measured execution of value rather than GKN’s reactive review of its business structure. The interests of shareholde­rs in both are best served by accepting Melrose’s raised bid.”

 ??  ?? REWIRED: Engineerin­g firm GKN says bids by Melrose under Miller, inset, are too low
REWIRED: Engineerin­g firm GKN says bids by Melrose under Miller, inset, are too low
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom