Criminal to let monsters stay
Virus apathy is a dying shame
■
ULRIKA’S had sex. Yep, that’s what qualifies as a news story these days. This week Ms Jonsson who has previously moaned (a lot) that she hadn’t had sex in five years has finally gone and done it with a new man. The drought is over. And while I’m sure everyone’s thrilled for her I, for one, am fed up hearing what feels like weekly reports on her sex life. Especially this week’s offering: “I feel like I’ve lost my virginity again…”
Oh come on now, Ulrika – enough! You’re entitled to have as much sex as you like – in fact fill your boots – but do shut up about it.
Because at 52, boasting about getting laid isn’t a good look.
THE World Health Organisation says the coronavirus is now a bigger threat than global terrorism and Professor Peter Piot, the microbiologist who co-discovered Ebola, says Britain is likely to suffer a major outbreak.
Yet still this Government is allowing people from China to flood into the UK every day. Still, it’s telling people to self-isolate without properly explaining what that actually means and still it’s protecting the identities of carriers as they unwittingly spread the disease (so as not to upset them).
What has to happen before this virus is treated with the seriousness it deserves? Of course we all know the answer to that – but of course by then people will have died.
SUPERMODEL Lara Stone, who split from comic David Walliams, is now engaged to property developer David Grievson. “She’s very happy with David and she loves that he’s not in the public eye like her ex was,” says her spokesman.
Of course she is – it never works having
TWO celebrities in one house competing for the limelight.
■
LIZ Hurley says she no longer likes exposing her skin in public because at 54, she’s too old. “I like to cover up a lot,” she insists. And here she is just days later at a friend’s birthday party…
IF I HEAR another hand-wringer from the liberal Left talk about the scandal of Windrush in the same breath as the deportation of a bunch of criminal scumbags, I’ll scream. It’s obscene to even think about comparing and conflating the two. Windrush was about the wrongful and shameful deportation of Commonwealth citizens, many of whom had lived in this country for decades but who, because they couldn’t produce official paperwork regarding their status here, were branded “illegals” and thrown out.
That travesty will remain a stain on this country for years to come.
But to compare what happened with the Windrush generation to the deportation of monsters who’ve raped and killed women, abused teenagers, trafficked class
A drugs, is beyond outrageous. If Windrush is a stain on this country, then getting rid of these criminals who’d been sentenced to 300 years’ jail time between them would be a badge of honour.
But no, we’re being told their deportation is a contravention of their human rights. That because many have families and children here it’s unfair to send them back to a country where they know no one.
Frankly, I’m not interested in whether they’ve got pals to play with in Jamaica. And if they truly cared about their families here, they wouldn’t commit crimes that could have them taken away from them. But the law, introduced by the Labour government in 2007, is clear – foreign nationals who are sentenced to one year or more in jail must be deported.
One of the people who was due to be on that plane (originally there were 50 odd) and who we’re apparently treating inhumanely is Jamaican drug dealer, Lloyd Byfield, who came to this country in 2000. This piece of vermin murdered young mum Leighann Duffy with a claw hammer and a kitchen knife in front of her six-yearold daughter. And when her daughter tried to intervene to protect mum, he battered her too. He also attacked one of his girlfriends with a chisel. Byfield should have been deported seven years before he killed Leighann but a judge allowed him to stay because he had a wife here. Seriously? How must Leighann Duffy’s family feel knowing that had Byfield been deported when he should have been, her little girl would still have her mum.
Then there’s Fitzroy Daley who knifed a man to death, Fabian Henry who sexually assaulted two teenagers. There’s the no-marks who raped, robbed and wielded guns. These people contribute nothing to this country yet their rights are put above those of their victims and of every other decent lawabiding citizen here.
Priti Patel must persist in getting rid of these monsters who’ve spent their miserable lives exploiting human rights and immigration laws to stay in a country they don’t deserve and have no legal right to live in.
There are 7,300 foreign national criminals roaming Britain’s streets, a figure that has almost doubled since 2013. Now they’ll be joined by some of the Jamaicans removed from that plane this week who can’t be held in custody and will now be free to slip under the radar, never to be seen again, putting more innocent people at risk.
The Home Secretary needs to make clear – not just to these criminals – but to our judges and the bleeding hearts forever making excuses for them that foreign nationals who kill, who rape, who abuse our kids and peddle drugs can’t stay here.
Get more than a year in jail – and you’re out!
I DO hope the new Chancellor Rishi Sunak won’t be considering a rumoured raid on pensions or a mansion tax in his March 11 budget. If we’d wanted that kind of anti-success, anti-aspiration nonsense, we’d have voted for Corbyn.
■
GRAN Rosemarie Riley, 76, from Skelmersdale, Lancashire, forgot her glasses when she went to the shops for a box of Tetley tea bags and mistakenly picked up a
box of condoms. Thank God her granddaughter, Gemma, spotted her mistake in time because not even a milk, three sugars and a digestive would make THOSE anyone’s cup of tea.
THREE cheers for the judge who jailed drunken barista Chloe Haines for two years after she tried to open the plane door at 30,000 feet prompting an RAF scramble. Now talking of baristas (they make coffee) I’ve got an interesting story to tell about one I encountered in Dorchester and I’d like your opinion on it. Look out for it next week…
■
NOT sure I agree with all of Jane Fonda’s eco/activist causes. Or the fact that at this year’s Oscars she claimed to be wearing “ethically-harvested gold and sustainable diamonds” (whatever the hell that means).
I just can’t get over the fact that at 82 she still has a face and body like this. I suspect Fonda was always more interested in her political causes and what Americans call “personal development” (expensive therapy sessions) than about the way she looks. But whether she likes it or not, what she’ll be remembered for is “feel the burn”, and that at 82 she was still hot!