Daily Express

Banning hugs is a mugs’ game

-

The recent passing of Colin Bell prompted some warming re-runs of a fine player in his pomp. One thing, apart from his wonderful athleticis­m and the farmer’s-field pitches, stood out. The goal celebratio­ns. By modern standards there weren’t any.

A shake of the hand maybe and perhaps a self-conscious hop in the air before trotting back to the halfway line but certainly no cuddling or pile-ons.That was partly down to the unfussy, mining-family manner of Bell, right, but also down to the social mores of 50 years ago.

It wasn’t quite the raiseyour-hat-in-the-street era but a fond public embrace between consenting gentlemen would have made plenty of that generation uncomforta­ble.

What goes around comes around. The group hug has been elevated to a crime of the coronaviru­s times, as the attention given to Phil Foden’s goal against Brighton on Wednesday night and the accompanyi­ng observatio­ns of Pep Guardiola have shown.

The demand for distancing, passed on by the Government to the Premier League, will be hammered home again ahead of this weekend’s fixtures. Apparently, with football and elite sport being given dispensati­on to continue through the latest lockdown, the right example needs to be set, so the team goal celebratio­n is a no-no.

Why exactly? By now, everyone knows the basics about halting the transmissi­on of the virus. Close contact encourages it. But only if the virus is around to pass on. It isn’t suddenly magicked into existence by a goal being scored.

Premier League footballer­s are the most tested individual­s in the country. Any who register positive are immediatel­y taken out of the squad environmen­t. No-one who remains available to play has Covid-19, so it stands to reason none of them can transmit it. Foden could have taken a full smacker on the lips from his team-mates on Wednesday and no damage would have been done.

If close contact is such an issue, corners should really be banned with all the jostling that goes on – and defensive walls, come to think of it. There is no sign of that happening.

If the clampdown is more to do with preventing copycat cuddles, then that is flawed logic too.With grassroots and junior football mothballed, there is no opportunit­y.

Maybe the fear is a knock-on effect outside sport but that doesn’t stack up either.As tidy as

Ivan Cavaleiro’s equaliser was against Tottenham in midweek, it is unlikely that even the most diehard of Fulham fans would have felt the need to set off on a regulation-breaking rampage down the street, knocking up their neighbours for a joyous embrace.

The breaches by footballer­s who thought there was one rule for them and another for the rest of society off the field over the festive period may raise the hackles but they do not change the facts. While the Covidiots should be punished, at a time when football’s role is to provide entertainm­ent, let the players show their enjoyment. We could do with all the happiness we can get at the moment.

As Guardiola said, celebratin­g goals is ingrained and hard to stop. The implicatio­n was that he did not particular­ly want his team to do so. No-one can accuse Guardiola of all people of taking the virus lightly. He lost his mother to it.

The reality is that there is no need to stop. The hug ban and the fuss around it is a red herring in the coronaviru­s fight.

 ??  ?? Fulham’s players celebrate Cavaleiro’s equaliser, which earned them a vital point
ENGLAND are playing Sri Lanka for the oddly-named Moose Cup. Maybe the Lemming Cup would have been a better choice after the way the home team batted yesterday.
Fulham’s players celebrate Cavaleiro’s equaliser, which earned them a vital point ENGLAND are playing Sri Lanka for the oddly-named Moose Cup. Maybe the Lemming Cup would have been a better choice after the way the home team batted yesterday.
 ??  ??
 ?? Picture: GLYN KIRK ??
Picture: GLYN KIRK

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom