RABBI DR JONATHAN ROMAIN

A RELIGIOUS principle that causes great suffering demands re-examination. To cling doggedly to the principle of the sanctity of life – as some do in this debate – is to ignore how dying has changed.

Medical advances over recent decades that have cured many diseases and mean we now live for much longer are, of course, to be applauded.

But these developments also mean we often die for longer, sometimes in great suffering, despite the best efforts of palliative care. If we want to ensure people can die well, as they have lived, we must reckon with this new reality – and religious principles must help, rather than hinder.

Denied

The assisted dying movement is undeniably at a turning point across the British Isles. Both the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition have pledged to commit time for a full debate and vote on it in the next parliament. Monday’s Westminster Hall debate rightly keeps the issue high on the political agenda.

I used to be against it for all the usual reasons. But as a Rabbi who often visits congregants in their final days, I have come to realise there are indeed fates worse than death when people are denied both choice and dignity as they die. Are we really prepared to say this is the best we can do for our dying citizens and their families?

I would argue not. The vast majority of Britons, including those with faith (two-thirds, according to a recent poll), agree.

Those who feel strongly that the principle of assisted dying is against their own personal beliefs should have their views respected. But that must not stand in the way of others having the choices they so desperately want and need.