Daily Mail

Andrew sex slave claims thrown out by a US judge

- By Christian Gysin

PRINCE Andrew will not face court action in the US over claims he had sex with an under-age girl, after a Florida judge ruled her claims must be struck out.

Virginia Roberts had hoped to join a lawsuit involving Andrew’s friend Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted paedophile and sex offender.

But last night Judge Kenneth Marra ordered her claims that she was a ‘sex slave’ to Epstein and was forced to have sex with the Duke of York three times should be ‘struck from the record’.

The judge refused to make a statement regarding the veracity of Miss Roberts’s allegation­s, but issued an order that the ‘lurid’ and ‘unnecessar­y’ claims should not be involved in the Epstein case.

‘At this juncture in the proceeding­s, these lurid details are unnecessar­y,’ he wrote. ‘These unnecessar­y details shall be stricken.’

Prince Andrew is not mentioned by name in the ten-page ruling, made in the Palm Beach County court, Florida.

But Judge Marra refers to the powerful people Miss Roberts was allegedly forced to have sex with by Epstein. Her claims of taking part in an orgy with the Duke and sleeping with him on two other occasions when she was 17 – below the age of consent in Florida – were described as ‘immaterial and impertinen­t’.

In 17 words, the judge may have drawn a line under a controvers­y that has dogged Prince Andrew since January. Miss Roberts, referred to as ‘Jane Doe 3’ in court papers, and another woman were hoping to join two other alleged victims of Epstein in suing the US government over a plea deal prosecutor­s struck with the financier.

But Judge Marra ruled yesterday that the Jane Doe 3 and 4 applicatio­ns should be denied and it was therefore ‘unnecessar­y’ for them to be added as plaintiffs.

When the court claim surfaced earlier this year, Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace refused to go into any details regarding the accusation­s. However, in late January he briefly referred to the allegation­s at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerlan­d, saying he wanted to ‘reiterate and reaffirm’ palace statements that insisted he never had any sexual contact or relationsh­ip with Miss Roberts.

She has repeatedly claimed she had sex three times with Andrew when she was 17 – a claim he emphatical­ly denies – and served papers on him via the British Embassy in Washington DC. But they were returned to sender. Her legal team’s bid to serve papers on the Duke came after courier FedEx returned a similar letter as it was ‘refused’ by the recipient at Buckingham Palace.

The court papers lodged in Florida accused Andrew of abusing Miss Roberts when she was 17.

She claimed that under the orders of paedophile Epstein she was ‘forced’ to have sex with the prince three times in 2001 – in London, New York and on Epstein’s Caribbean island. The 55-year-old royal was so concerned about the allega- tions that he consulted top criminal QC William Clegg. Andrew’s long friendship with Epstein was said to include lavish parties and exotic holidays, but it raised questions over the prince’s choice of friends.

He was introduced to the billionair­e by Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of disgraced media tycoon Robert Maxwell.

The fifth in line to the throne was forced to effectivel­y cool, but not end, the friendship when sex claims were made against the financier. In June 2008, Epstein began serving 13 months of an 18-month sentence after pleading guilty to soliciting a girl, 14, for prostituti­on. Andrew was summoned by the Queen after pictures emerged of him in New York with Epstein in February 2011, after the financier had been released from prison.

It emerged Epstein had given Andrew’s ex-wife Sarah Ferguson £15,000 to help reduce her debts.

Last night Buckingham Palace declined to comment.

The Duke was not a party to the court action and was not given the opportunit­y to rebut the allegation­s through the court.

 ??  ?? Accusation­s: The Duke of York pictured with Virginia Roberts in 2001
Accusation­s: The Duke of York pictured with Virginia Roberts in 2001

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom