Daily Mail

MPs back plan for ‘abortion on demand’ law

Campaigner­s fear end of 24-week limit

- By Sam Greenhill and Steve Doughty s.greenhill@dailymail.co.uk

‘Removes many safeguards’

A ProPoSED law dubbed ‘ abortion on demand’ narrowly cleared its first hurdle in the Commons last night.

mPs voted by 172 to 142 to decriminal­ise terminatio­ns in England and Wales.

The Abortion Act, passed in 1967, did not decriminal­ise abortion, but made it legal if two doctors approve the procedure.

Yesterday Labour mP Diana Johnson’s Private member’s Bill passed its first stage, meaning it will be debated further on march 24.

It is unlikely to become law, however, unless it is backed by the Government, but campaigner­s claim the Bill could pave the way for the legalisati­on by stealth of abortion after the current 24-week limit.

Introducin­g her reproducti­ve Health (Access to Terminatio­ns) Bill, miss Johnson said she wanted to change ‘Victorian’ laws that carry a life sentence for women and doctors.

She said: ‘Women are poorly served by laws which state that even early-term abortions are inherently criminal, and doctors are poorly served by a criminal framework which doesn’t apply to other areas of healthcare.’

She argued that the law was inappropri­ate in an age when women can access abortion pills by post. Speaking against the motion, Conservati­ve mP maria Caulfield argued the Bill would be ‘a charter for unsafe abortion practices not dissimilar to the backstreet abortions’.

Under current laws, it is illegal to have an abortion after 24 weeks for non-medical reasons and each procedure must be signed off by two doctors.

The Bill is backed by the royal College of midwives and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), a charity which receives £26 million a year from the NHS to carry out abortions. Clare murphy, director at BPAS, said: ‘Women in difficult circumstan­ces are not protected or supported by laws that criminalis­e them.’

But rob Flello, Labour mP for Stoke- on-Trent South, said: ‘The proposed Bill, which would allow for abortion on demand up to birth for any reason, is extreme and out of touch with the views of the general public.’

Fiona Bruce mP, chairman of the Parliament­ary pro- life group, added: ‘The proposal would remove many safeguards, currently there to help women make an informed decision, such as discussing their situation with a medical profession­al so they know all their options, and the risks involved.

‘Today’s proposal, suggesting, for example, that women could obtain abortion pills by post, would deny them this opportunit­y, which can be critical for women in abusive situations – often the only chance they have to speak to someone about the pressures they are facing.’

Last week the Daily mail revealed how abortion provider marie Stopes makes a mockery of the current laws by getting doctors to certify grounds for terminatio­n without even seeing the patient.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom