Daily Mail

Pregnancy test ‘cover-up’ claim over birth defects

- By Sophie Borland Health Editor

A DRUGS giant has been accused of a 40-year cover-up over a pregnancy test linked to serious birth defects.

The test prescribed to around 1.5million British women in the 1960s and 1970s involved taking two pills to check whether they were pregnant.

The medication, Primodos, has since been taken off the market, but it has been blamed for brain damage, heart defects and shortened limbs. Campaigner­s have labelled it the ‘forgotten thalidomid­e’ after the morning sickness drug from 1950s and 1960s that caused deformitie­s in thousands of children.

A committee of British experts will now examine previously unseen documents linking Primodos to similar birth defects.

Some of the children born to mothers who took the pills died before adulthood, while many of those still alive are deaf, blind, have shortened limbs or problems with their spines.

Women took two pills to induce their monthly period and if this did not happen within a few days, the pregnancy was confirmed.

Yet they contained a powerful dose of the hormone progester- one, which is now used in contracept­ive pills and the morning-after pill to prevent pregnancy.

The German manufactur­er Schering presumed that if a woman was pregnant, the hormones would be reabsorbed in her blood without harm.

But the concentrat­ions were extremely high – one dose of Pri- modos equates to 40 oral contracept­ive pills.

The documents unearthed by the Berlin National Archives will be scrutinise­d by the UK Government’s Commission on Human Medicines’ Expert Working Group on Hormone Pregnancy Tests.

Campaigner­s hope it will provide evidence that will enable families to sue for hundreds of thousands of pounds in compensati­on. An attempt by 700 families to sue the manufactur­er collapsed in 1982.

Labour MP Yasmin Qureshi, who has long supported affected families, said: ‘These documents form a significan­t discovery. I believe there may have been a cover-up over the effect of this drug on pregnant mothers.’

The documents include a letter from Dr William Inman, a UK government medical officer, to Schering stating that women taking the test had a 20 per cent chance of having a baby with deformitie­s.

But he did not tell the manufactur­er to withdraw the drug – he merely urged it to take steps to avoid ‘medico-legal’ problems.

Schering, now owned by the German firm Bayer, said it ‘rejects any suggestion’ of a cover-up.

It added that evidence for a link between the tests and deformitie­s was ‘extremely weak’.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom