Daily Mail

BBC attacks Cliff ’s ‘grossly unreasonab­le’ £800k bill for legal fight

- By Vanessa Allen

‘A great deal emerged’

SIR Cliff Richard has spent ‘grossly unreasonab­le’ sums on lawyers in his court battle against the BBC, the broadcaste­r said yesterday.

The singer has already spent close to £800,000 on legal bills, almost a year before the case is expected to go to full trial, court documents revealed.

Lawyers for the BBC claimed that his spending was ‘grossly unreasonab­le and disproport­ionate’ and asked a High Court judge to express ‘strong disapprova­l’.

Sir Cliff, 76, is suing the broadcaste­r and South Yorkshire Police for up to £1.5million after a police raid on his home was shown live as officers rifled through his possession­s following historical allegation­s of child sexual abuse against him.

The entertaine­r has previously said he spent a small fortune on lawyers and public relations in the immediate aftermath of the 2014 raid to try to limit the damage to his reputation.

He is seeking to claim that money back in damages in the court case. If he is successful, the BBC and the police force could also be forced to pay some or all of his legal bills, on top of his claim for damages.

Police searched his £3million apartment in Sunningdal­e, Berkshire, during their investigat­ion. The raid was filmed by a BBC helicopter after one of its journalist­s was tipped off that the star was under suspicion.

Sir Cliff, who was never charged with any offence, has accused the BBC and the police force of striking a deal to broadcast the search and has demanded to know the identity of the broadcaste­r’s source.

Details of his lawyers’ bills were revealed at the High Court in London in documents filed on behalf of the BBC. Its barrister Gavin Millar QC said: ‘The court should record its strong disapprova­l of the grossly unreasonab­le and disproport­ionate costs incurred by the claimant [Sir Cliff] to date.

‘ The claimant’s budget shows pre-action costs of £ 525,437, including 1,287 hours of solicitors’ time.’

The singer’s solicitors and barristers had billed a further £262,295 for ‘unnecessar­ily long and detailed’ statements filed to the court, he said, amounting to £787,732 in total.

Mr Millar said the main issues of the case had already been examined by MPs on the Home Affairs select committee and questioned why Sir Cliff’s legal bills were so high.

He said: ‘Though not without its legal complexiti­es, this case cannot have required extensive factual investigat­ions on behalf of the claimant: The broadcasts are in the public domain and a great deal emerged about the position of the BBC and South Yorkshire Police in the course of proceeding­s before the Home Affairs Committee.’

A preliminar­y hearing was held at the High Court over Sir Cliff’s demands that the BBC should reveal its source. The singer did not attend.

His lawyers claim the tip-off came from within Operation Yewtree, the Scotland Yard probe into historical sexual abuse claims set up after the Jimmy Savile scandal. The BBC said it should not be forced to reveal its confidenti­al source. It has previously said its broadcast was in the public interest and that it does not believe Sir Cliff should be entitled to damages or compensati­on.

Lawyers for Sir Cliff said the broadcast of the raid had left him feeling ‘violated’ and that he had suffered ‘profound damage to his reputation’.

The initial allegation made against the singer was that he molested a boy at an event by US evangelist Billy Graham in Sheffield in 1985. Eight other men then came forward with allegation­s of offences between 1958 and 1983.

But prosecutor­s announced last year that Sir Cliff would not face charges, and it emerged that among those making claims against him were known fantasists, a rapist and a blackmaile­r.

A spokesman for Sir Cliff said: ‘He incurred these costs and expenses over more than a two-year period, we say as a direct result of the actions of South Yorkshire Police and the BBC. It will be down to a judge to decide whether or not he should recover such costs and expenses in full or in part, or at all.’

The preliminar­y hearing continues today.

 ??  ?? Sir Cliff: Two-year ordeal
Sir Cliff: Two-year ordeal

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom