Daily Mail

Islamic school splitting sexes at break time ‘is apartheid’

- By Eleanor Harding Education Correspond­ent

Named at last: Islamic school that wants to gag Ofsted

SEGREGATIN­G pupils for religious reasons harms girls’ life chances and creates ‘an apartheid’ within schools, judges in a landmark appeal case have heard.

Education watchdog Ofsted has said Muslim faith schools which separate boys and girls are guilty of sex discrimina­tion.

The Court of Appeal is to decide whether Al-Hijrah School in Birmingham has breached equality laws by segregatin­g pupils from the age of nine for both teaching and break times.

In the first case of its kind, the statefunde­d Islamic school is challengin­g its own critical Ofsted report, which found separating the pupils left them ‘unprepared for life in modern Britain’.

Until now, the name of the school has been kept secret – but following an appeal by the Daily Mail on Monday the anonymity order was lifted. Ofsted also found the school kept ‘offensive’ books in the library which advocated wife beating and forced sex – a fact the school is not challengin­g.

The case will influence whether Ofsted is able to mark down Islamic and other faith schools in future for segregatin­g pupils – a controvers­ial practice which campaigner­s say makes girls feel inferior.

Government lawyers said yesterday there were a ‘number of schools’ that would have to stop segregatin­g, or split into single sex schools if Ofsted wins the case. Yesterday, Helen Mount-

From yesterday’s Mail field QC, representi­ng the watchdog, said segregatin­g pupils in a mixed sex school was against the Equality Act 2010.

She said it created ‘a kind of apartheid within one environmen­t’ which gives girls ‘a sense that “I’m different”’. This is not the case in single sex schools, where the separation does not occur in the same environmen­t, she reasoned.

She said segregatio­n suggested ‘the difference between men and women is so great that they cannot be allowed to share a space’. Ofsted believes the arrangemen­ts were detrimenta­l to both sexes because they were not being ‘ prepared for life in modern Britain’.

Miss Mountfield added: ‘ But this creates a particular detriment for females as neither male nor female pupils are socialised to regard women as normal working and social com- panions for men... in a society in which men still hold the significan­t majority of power.’

The initial inspection was carried out in June last year, with Ofsted concluding the school was ‘inadequate’ and needed to be put in special measures over the offensive books, the segregatio­n and a number of other issues. The school then challenged the segregatio­n point in a judicial review.

Mr Justice Jay ruled in their favour in November last year and agreed that segregatio­n was not illegal. Ofsted is now seeking to overturn this ruling in the Court of Appeal.

The case continues today.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom