Daily Mail

Boots ‘caves in to the Labour radicals’ in morning after pill row

- By Daniel Martin Policy Editor

BOOTS was criticised last night for ‘capitulati­ng in the face of political pressure’ over the cost of the morning after pill.

The high-street chemist originally defied calls to slash the price of emergency contracept­ion – with its chief pharmacist saying it did not want to ‘incentivis­e inappropri­ate use’.

But late on Friday night Boots released a statement to say it was ‘truly sorry’ about its ‘poor choice of words’, and was looking at cheaper alternativ­es.

The climb- down came after a campaign led by abortion provider BPAS and supported by female Labour MPs, two of whom backed calls for women to boycott the store over its stance.

Last night the Christian Medical Fellowship said Boots had given in to a ‘cartel of radical feminist MPs’ – and now risked encouragin­g a rise in sexually transmitte­d diseases.

Spokesman Dr Peter Saunders said Boots had ‘failed to support’ chief pharmacist, Marc Donovan, who had put forward ‘legitimate’ concerns about overuse of the pill. Having forced Boots to back down, BPAS is now understood to be turning its fire on Lloyds Pharmacy, which has also refused to cut the cost of contracept­ion.

BPAS said the chain was selling a non-branded version of the pill for £28.25, more than double that charged by other outlets.

While Tesco and Superdrug agreed to halve the cost of the Levonelle pill, Boots originally refused to do so.

The chain said it would continue to charge £28.25 for the contracept­ion, with Mr Donovan saying it polarised public opinion and many felt the store should not supply it at all.

He said: ‘We would not want to be accused of incentivis­ing inappropri­ate use, and provoking complaints, by significan­tly reducing the price.’ The stance angered female 35 Labour MPs, who wrote to Boots to demand a change of course, calling the pill vital ‘backup contracept­ion’. Two of them urged women to ‘vote with their feet’ and boycott Boots – prompting pro-life campaigner­s to accuse them of ‘bullying’.

On Friday night, Boots apologised for its previous position.

It said: ‘We are truly sorry that our poor choice of words in describing our position on emer- gency hormonal contracept­ion (EHC) has caused offence.’

The chain said its price was based on the cost of the tablet and the consultati­on a pharmacarr­ies out with women, but that it is ‘ committed’ to finding less expensive versions.

Boots charges £28.25 for Levonelle and £26.75 for its own version, while Tesco charges £13.50 for Levonelle and Superdrug £13.49 for a generic product.

A Boots spokesman said: ‘We firmly believe in the right of all women to access the EHC service with ease and convenienc­e.

‘We are committed to looking at the sourcing of less expensive EHC medicines ... to enable us to continue to make a privately funded EHC service even more accessible in the future.’

Last night Dr Saunders said: ‘It is regrettabl­e that Boots has capitulate­d in the face of political pressure and failed to support its chief UK pharmacist in his legitimate concerns over incentivis­ing the inappropri­ate use of emergency contracept­ion.

‘By appeasing this cartel of radical feminist MPs Boots is encouragin­g more reckless sexual behaviour and thereby exposing young people to an increased risk of sexually transmitte­d infections.’

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? from Saturday’s Mail
from Saturday’s Mail

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom