Daily Mail

7million homes ‘should be given cash refund’ for slow broadband

- By Claire Ellicott Political Correspond­ent

NEARLY seven million households should be given refunds on their broadband bills because they are not getting the designated minimum speed, MPs said yesterday.

said Their 6.7million cross-partyof the committeec­ountry’s 22million broadband connection­s were slower than the proposed minimum download of 10 megabits per second.

It also found that fewer than half of all connection­s were ‘superfast’ – above 24 megabits. MPs said this painted ‘a worrying picture for postBrexit Britain’s competitiv­eness’. The findings cast further doubt on the Government’s pledge to have superfast broadband in 95 per cent of the country by the end of the year.

The report describes the sector as ‘characteri­sed by selfregula­tion, a lack of transparen­cy, and an absence of minimum standards that fail to protect the rights of broadband customers’.

Grant Shapps, the Conservati­ve MP who is chairman of the British Infrastruc­ture Group, said: ‘With the country leaving the European Union in 20 months’ time, being ready for the global fight means having the best internet in the world.

‘The current situation is simply not good enough and this report calls on the Government, Ofcom and internet providers to speed up delivery.’

An Ofcom report in April this year said broadband customers were only getting around half the speed they pay for. In March, BT was fined £42million after it took too long to deliver superfast broadband to businesses. The Advertisin­g Standards Agency has already called for a change in the way broadband speed claims are promoted. It found that millions were being ripped off by broadband providers and barely 10 per cent received the superfast speeds promised.

As a result, more than 15million households get slow internet due to a loophole in which firms could advertise broadband as ‘up to’ certain speeds.

Today’s report criticised the standard of customer service and complaints procedures offered by internet providers. It advocates a compensati­on scheme of £10 a day for loss of service and £30 for a missed appointmen­t.

It revealed that the industry claimed that an automatic compensati­on scheme would ‘harm market competitio­n’.

Market leader BT received more complaints that any other provider in the first three months of this year. MPs said its compensati­on agreement was ‘vague, unregulate­d and not transparen­t’.

Underlinin­g the importance of access to the internet, the report says: ‘Broadband is increasing­ly considered to be akin to any other utility such as water or gas.

However, unlike in other utilities markets, there are still no minimum standards for broadband customer services, nor regulation­s governing compensati­on payments.’

It said: ‘When broadband services fail, the difficulti­es caused can be disruptive as a power cut or loss of water.’

Ofcom previously found that 1.4million people had download speeds below ten megabits per second.

MPs argued the system made it ‘almost impossible’ to determine how many households did not receive the speeds set out in their contracts.

The report also noted that the areas that received the slowest speeds had not changed significan­tly over the past three years and were ‘predominan­tly rural’.

MPs said the voluntary nature of the complaints and compensati­on system was insufficie­nt.

A spokesman for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport said last night: ‘Almost 95 per cent of the UK can now get superfast broadband, but we know millions of homes and businesses have not yet chosen to upgrade.’

‘As disruptive as a power cut’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom