Daily Mail

Diana’s devastatin­g revenge from grave

÷Millions tune in to C4’s shocking documentar­y ÷Nation divided over intimate revelation­s ÷ But man behind tapes says it’s historical record

- By Harriet Sime Showbusine­ss News Editor

‘A conversati­on I shouldn’t listen to’

THE broadcast of the controvers­ial Diana documentar­y divided its British TV audience last night.

Channel 4 defied criticism to air private video recordings in which the princess revealed details of her sex life with Prince Charles.

The broadcaste­r had ignored a public outcry and criticism from those who accused it of paying ‘blood money’ for the ‘deeply personal’ recordings.

Although some of the tapes had previously been broadcast in America, it was the first time the footage was viewed by a British audience.

Many viewers went on Twitter to give teir reaction, labelling Channel 4 ‘disrespect­ful’, ‘intrusive’ and ‘tacky.

One user said: ‘I can’t believe Channel 4 would have the nerve to make these Diana tapes public. They are being very disrespect­ful towards her memory.’

But others said that despite not agreeing with the tapes being broadcast, they struggled to switch it off.

One said: ‘I’m a walking contradict­ion. I don’t agree with this being showing yet I’m so intrigued in watching it.’ Another wrote: ‘Feel like I’m overhearin­g a conversati­on I shouldn’t be listening to.’

The documentar­y Diana: In Her Own Words is centred on tapes recorded by her speech coach, ex-Coronation Street actor Peter Settelen, during vocal coaching lessons between September 1992 and December 1993 at Kensington Palace.

The princess speaks candidly and informally about her courtship with the Prince of Wales, her troubled marriage and her ‘very odd’ sex life.

The 20 recordings were uncovered by Scotland Yard when officers raided former royal butler Paul Burrell’s flat in January 2001. The content was regarded as so sensitive that the prosecutio­n agreed not to use them in Mr Burrell’s Old Bailey trial which collapsed in 2002.

After a bitter legal row between Mr Settelen, 65, and the Spencer family, headed by her brother, the tapes were returned to the voice coach after it was concluded that he held the copyright.

They have never been aired in Britain despite being broadcast by America’s NBC in 2004 and those closest to Diana have maintained that she never believed they would be made public. The recordings were purchased by the BBC but later shelved.

The Queen’s former press secretary Dickie Arbiter said Diana had no idea the tapes would ever be made public, and that the content would be incredibly hurtful for her family.

‘It is absolutely shameful that these tapes have been made available. It seems that there is sort of grubby blood money running around,’ he told Sky News last week.

‘Whether these tapes are revealing or not, they were recorded in private on the understand­ing they would remain private and ... Settelen should have thought before giving them to Channel 4.

‘Channel 4 should really think deeply, not about ... their ratings figures but about the people and family who are still around who will find this very hurtful.’

His searing criticism came after it emerged that Diana’s brother Earl Spencer had tried to stop the Channel 4 documentar­y from going ahead.

However, her former equerry defended Channel 4’s decision to broadcast the videos.

Patrick Jephson, her private secretary for eight years until 1996, said that he had ‘ better reason than most to know that the princess could be a mercurial and impulsive figure in whom the flame of an angry fire could sometimes burn uncomforta­bly hot’.

Mr Jephson called the recordings ‘legitimate additions to the historical record’ and claimed that they showed Diana ‘finding her voice’.

Channel 4 has defended its decision to show the tapes by insisting that they are ‘matter of public record’.

Mr Settelen’s lawyer Marcus Rutherford said Diana took ‘every opportunit­y to tell whoever would listen – including deliberate­ly for publicatio­n – what she was going through’.

Those who watched the broadcast last night saw the princess

FROM PREVIOUS PAGE making a number of revelation­s. Among them were:

FIRST ENCOUNTER WITH CHARLES

Diana says she had previously been ‘unimpresse­d’ by Charles, but after meeting him at a polo match in sussex when she was 18-and-a-half she thought: ‘I am quite impressed this time round.’ she adds: ‘He chatted me up, you know, he was like a bad rash, he was all over me, and I thought, you know, urgh, [pulls back, pulls face].’

After saying Charles needed someone by his side, she says he ‘leapt’ on her. ‘He started kissing me and everything, and I thought, “urgh this is not what people do”.’ she adds: ‘And he was all over me for the rest of the evening, followed me around, everything, like a puppy. I was flattered but I was very puzzled.’

EARLY DAYS OF COURTSHIP

the princess says Charles ‘wasn’t consistent with his courting abilities’. she says: ‘He’d ring me up every day for a week and then he wouldn’t speak to me for three weeks; very odd. And I’d accepted that and I thought fine, well he knows where I am if he wants me. And then the thrill when he used to ring up was so immense and intense, drive the other three girls in my flat crazy. But no, it was all, it was odd.’

ENGAGEMENT

Diana reveals she had met Charles only 13 times before their wedding, before giggling nervously.

she adds: ‘I was brought up with the sense that when you get engaged to someone, you loved them.’

Recalling an interview in 1981 after their engagement was announced which left her ‘traumatise­d’, she tells voice coach Peter settelen: ‘the most extraordin­ary thing is we had this ghastly interview the day we announced our engagement and this ridiculous ItN man said, “Are you in love?”

‘I thought what a thick question so I said, “Yes, of course we are”, in the sort of sloane Ranger I was, and Charles turned round and said, “Whatever in love means”. that threw me completely. I thought what a strange question and answer. God. Absolutely traumatise­d me.’

SEX WITH CHARLES

she describes how she and Charles had sex ‘sort of once every three weeks’ but their ‘odd, very odd’ sex life ‘fizzled out’ after Harry was born in 1984.

she says: ‘It was odd, very odd. But it was there, then it fizzled out about seven years ago, six years ago, well seven, because Harry was eight. Instinct told me, it was just so odd. I don’t know, there was no requiremen­t for it from his case.’

CHARLES AND PRINCE PHILIP ON THE AFFAIR

Diana says that when she confronted Charles over his infidelity with Camilla, he replied: ‘I refuse to be the only Prince of Wales who never had a mistress.’ Recalling a conversati­on between Charles and his father in which the Duke of Edinburgh appeared to condone his affair, she says: ‘My father-in-law said to my husband, “If your marriage doesn’t work out you can always go back to her after five years”.’

QUEEN’S ADVICE AFTER CHARLES’S AFFAIR

Diana says she went sobbing to the Queen, who she referred to as ‘the top lady’, to ask for advice about her failing marriage and Charles’s infidelity.

she says: ‘I asked her, “What do I do? I’m coming to you, what do I do?” ’ – to which she said the Queen replied: ‘I don’t know what you should do, Charles is hopeless.’ the princess adds: ‘And that was it. that was help. so I didn’t go back to her again for help.’

BULIMIA

she blames the state of the marriage and her isolation in the Royal Family for her eating disorder.

‘Everyone knew about the bulimia in the family and they all blamed the failure of the marriage on the bulimia. And that’s taken some time to get them thinking differentl­y,’ she says.

she says that she told the Royal Family: ‘I was rejected, I didn’t think I was good enough for this family, so I took it out on myself.

‘I could have gone to alcohol – which would have been obvious. I could have gone anorexic – which would have been even more obvious. I decided to do it more discreetly. Which ultimately wasn’t discreet. But I chose to hurt myself instead of hurting all of you.’

PUTTING ON A BRAVE FACE IN PUBLIC

While behind palace doors the royal couple faced emotional struggles, Diana claims that when in public they were a ‘good team’.

she says: ‘I used to get in the car with Charles and I used to blub in the car. there would be crowds everywhere and he would say, “Now what’s the matter?” I said, “I can’t be in this car”. He said, “Why?” “I can’t be in this car, I don’t feel safe”. I was neurotic almost but then when I got out of the car [pulls face of calm].’

‘BEST TIME OF MY LIFE’ LIVING WITH FRIENDS

Diana says her happiest time was while living with three friends in a flat on Old Brompton Road in Chelsea while she was in her teens.

‘I loved it, so happy there. I had three girls living with me and I had the best time of my life,’ she recalls.

BEING REBELLIOUS

‘I was a rebel, I always did the dares, I always did the opposite of everyone else. I wasn’t academical­ly interested at all, I just wanted to be with people and have fun and look after people,’ she adds, rolling her eyes in self-parody. ‘But the rebel thing was always there. It was underlying. It didn’t come out. Or they didn’t see it.’

 ??  ?? Coy: Diana in the tapes seen last night. Right: Peter Settelen last week
Coy: Diana in the tapes seen last night. Right: Peter Settelen last week

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom