Daily Mail

My victory in the 2nd Battle of Trafalgar

-

ONE day in 1994, in my new position as Chair of the Royal Society of Arts, I got it in my head to do something about the monumental plinth on the north-west corner of Trafalgar Square, which had been empty since it was built in 1840.

It had been intended for an equestrian statue of William IV, but when he died he was so unpopular no one wanted it. Ever since, every attempt to fill the plinth had been thwarted by objections.

My first thought was to ask the public for suggestion­s, but I soon gave up. They were mostly for Gazza; Pooh Bear; and a giant pigeon. The obvious thing would be an equestrian statue to match the one on the opposite side of the square.

But who would be the rider? The Palace never sanctions statues of royals while they are still living; any sculpture favoured by one of the Armed Forces would never be agreed by the others; and political heroes are unwelcome in Trafalgar Square.

I needed help. I set up a committee under the Royal Society of Arts. One member, James Lingwood, had a brilliant idea — why not use the plinth for ‘ contempora­ry temporary’ exhibition­s of a variety of works? That way anyone with objections could comfort themselves with the thought that the hated work would not be there for ever.

We had to raise sponsorshi­p, commission a historic report, a feasibilit­y study, a risk assessment, endless engineerin­g drawings, and consult every sort of expert and all interested parties, from the Victorian Society to the Residents’ Associatio­n of Trafalgar Square.

I presented our plans to 13 different bodies. All came round except the Royal Fine Art Com-mission, chaired by Baron St John of Fawsley, better known as Norman St John-Stevas. If they objected, English Heritage would follow suit — and Westminste­r Council would not move without English Heritage’s approval.

The eccentric Norman would not take my calls. The Secretary to the Commission, Francis Golding, told me Lord St John would not discuss the plinth. He believed it should stay empty.

I asked the developer, Peter Palumbo, a friend of Norman’s, to intercede. He was enthusiast­ic and picked up the phone. I could hear Norman’s response from across the desk. ‘ Horreur, horreur, horreur!’ he cried. Palumbo put the phone down. ‘Sorry,’ he said. ‘He’s adamant.’

I even persuaded the then Minister of Culture, Virginia Bottomley to invite Norman to a meeting to discuss the plans, but he dodged every date she suggested. Then I got a letter from the Royal Fine Art Commission baldly announcing that the commission­ers had discussed the RSA’s ideas for the plinth and unanimousl­y decided against them.

I was livid and replied that as we’d not been given a chance to outline our proposals, they were in no position to judge the matter. We urgently needed an hour to outline our plans. In the end they agreed. Penny Egan, Director of the RSA, and I turned up at noon armed with a half-hour presentati­on to be followed by discussion.

We sat downstairs and waited. And waited. We were admitted at ten to one. Norman didn’t introduce any of his commission­ers, nor did he intro-duce Penny. His introducti­on for me went something like this:

‘Well, you all know Prue Leith, the well-known cook. I am sure it will surprise you to find a cook is somehow concerning herself with the arts. But there we are. Prue, I’m sorry but we really only have ten minutes before lunch so I think we must dispense with your presentati­on.’

Penny and I left, further fired up to defeat the old fox. We set about lobbying individual commission­ers and quickly real-ised there was support for us.

After the commission finally met to consider the submission, one of them rang to tell us we’d won the day. But next day a letter came from Norman declaring the Commission had unanimousl­y voted against the scheme.

By now my dander was most definitely up — I wrote to him saying I knew how the votes had gone and I’d like to see the min-utes of the meeting. The Com-mission dropped their objections, which meant English Heritage raised no objections and Westminste­r gave permission.

It had been a five-year war, but we’d won it. For the first time in its 177-year history, the plinth was filled. And every time I pass it, I feel a little glow of pride.

 ??  ?? Artistic pride: Mark Wallinger’s Ecce Homo, the first statue on Trafalgar Square’s fourth plinth
Artistic pride: Mark Wallinger’s Ecce Homo, the first statue on Trafalgar Square’s fourth plinth

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom