Daily Mail

STINGING RAGE AT CITY FAT CATS WHO BETRAYED HIS TRUST

- COMMENTARY by Alex Brummer CITY EDITOR

FINALLY, after a decade of waiting, a politician at the very heart of the financial crisis has found the courage to hit back hard at the greedy bankers who wreaked havoc on the economy.

The former Labour chancellor’s declaratio­n of war on the fat cat, lying and irresponsi­ble bankers at Royal Bank of Scotland, Northern Rock, HBOS and Barclays is unpreceden­ted, coming as it does from one of the major players before, during and after the meltdown that squeezed the living standards of almost every citizen in Britain.

And it should find great favour among the public, which has never forgiven the bankers for their rapacious behaviour.

Brown’s opinion has particular resonance because this was the Prime Minister who claimed before the Commons that he had ‘ saved the world’ after launching a bailout of the British financial system, which at its peak put the taxpayer in hock for almost one trillion pounds, or around half the total output of the whole British economy.

In his assault, Brown spares the blushes of no one, including his fellow Scot Fred Goodwin – whom he accuses of pursuing and pushing through a ‘catastroph­ic takeover’ of the near-bankrupt Dutch bank ABN Amro in 2007. He also says Goodwin failed to show ‘a shred of contrition’ when it all went wrong.

Brown’s stinging rage about the behaviour of the bankers – and the events which destroyed his reputation as the Chancellor who ended ‘boom and bust’ – have clearly been building during his self-imposed exile at home with his family in Scotland. This brooding period of reflection has reinforced his belief that the trust he placed in free market capitalism and the City was betrayed and abused.

He argues now that the bankers and financiers he entertaine­d in Downing Street months before the whole edifice collapsed were traitors who, like their counterpar­ts in Spain and Iceland, should have been imprisoned for fraud.

THIS

paper has always argued that it is inexplicab­le that in Britain there has been no dogged attempt by the financial regulators, the Serious Fraud Office, or the other judicial authoritie­s to bring bankers at the highest level to justice.

It is one of the great paradoxes that the only top bankers to face fraud charges, still to be heard in the courts, are four former senior executives at Barclays.

Yet Barclays, unlike Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds-HBOS, refused to be part of the government bailout when Brown launched it on October 8, 2008.

Brown is as contemptuo­us of the way that Barclays behaved as he is of the other banks which enjoyed a direct taxpayer rescue.

He reveals that Barclays, after paying an undisclose­d service fee of £300million to Qatar (as part of an operation to salvage the bank by Qatar and Abu Dhabi) continued to behave as if the crisis had never happened.

Barclays is understood to have explored buying the collapsing New York investment bank Lehman Brothers, and was only halted in its tracks by UK regulators.

It is hard not to support the Brown’s mocking of the egotistica­l extravagan­ces of Fred Goodwin at RBS, and his lambasting of the banks for paying excessive divi- dends to shareholde­rs in the runup to the crisis. But in lashing out at the alleged criminal behaviour of the bankers, Brown takes no responsibi­lity for the explosion in credit that was made available between 1997 and 2007, which led to the run on Northern Rock, and exposed Britain to internatio­nal ridicule as a banana republic.

Moreover, there is no hint of repentance over the calamitous private deal he hatched with Lloyds Bank chairman Sir Victor Blank and his board for the ‘Black Horse’ to come riding to the rescue of HBOS.

The role of Brown and the Government in signing off on the merger between Lloyds and HBOS is currently the subject of a High Court battle: a prominent group of shareholde­rs are seeking redress for the fact that they were not informed of the terrible state of HBOS when it was merged with Lloyds.

So while it is easy to agree with much of Brown’s rhetoric, and to feel sympathy for the hard decisions he had to take in rescuing the crooked banks – he had even drawn up a letter of resignatio­n over the bailout plan – he shows little self-awareness about his own role in the creation of the debt bubble at the banks.

At least part of the blame can be parked at the doors of Brown’s Treasury, and the steps taken by an over- confident New Labour government in 1997.

As Chancellor, Brown was responsibl­e, days after taking office, for granting the Bank of England independen­ce in the setting of interest rates. But much to the chagrin of Eddie George, the late, great governor of the Bank, he also decided to take regulation of the major banks away from Threadneed­le Street, and pass it to a new regulator, the Financial Services Authority.

The FSA had no experience of policing big powerful banking institutio­ns and none of the moral authority or market intelligen­ce which rests with the Bank of England.

Banks were allowed to expand their balance sheets virtually unchecked and, as late as 2007, after the major investment bank Bear Stearns had failed in the US, and Northern Rock collapsed in Britain, the light-touch FSA nodded through the RBS takeover of ABN Amro of which Brown is now so fiercely critical.

BROwN

also convenient­ly forgets how New Labour benefited from the banks and financial sector. The City was the goose which laid the golden egg, contributi­ng a large proportion of the nation’s tax revenues – which helped him embark on large-scale spending on the NHS, and his pet welfare schemes such as the working family tax credits.

Under Brown’s financial stewardshi­p, the State expanded by leaps and bounds. But it could not have been done if he and the Treasury had not embraced the banks. He personally opened Lehman Brothers’ new headquarte­rs in the City, and acknowledg­es he was a guest of honour at Fred Goodwin’s monument to extravagan­ce, the RBS headquarte­rs outside Edinburgh.

There is no doubt Gordon Brown was a big thinker who brought brave new ideas to economics, finance and the global trading system and who wisely, with the assistance of Ed Balls, kept Britain out of the euro.

But the City and the banking system was his Achilles heel, and he still cannot intellectu­ally reconcile himself to the idea that he must bear some responsibi­lity for the collapse.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom